Re: [PATCH] oom_kill: remove unused parameter in badness()

[Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Li Zefan wrote:
> In commit 4c4a22148909e4c003562ea7ffe0a06e26919e3c, we moved the
> memcontroller-related code from badness() to select_bad_process(),
> so the parameter 'mem' in badness() is unused now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mm/oom_kill.c |    5 ++---
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index f255eda..8be1baf 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zone_scan_mutex);
>   *    of least surprise ... (be careful when you change it)
>   */
> 
> -unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime,
> -			struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> +unsigned long badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime)
>  {
>  	unsigned long points, cpu_time, run_time, s;
>  	struct mm_struct *mm;
> @@ -254,7 +253,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints,
>  		if (p->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE)
>  			continue;
> 
> -		points = badness(p, uptime.tv_sec, mem);
> +		points = badness(p, uptime.tv_sec);
>  		if (points > *ppoints || !chosen) {
>  			chosen = p;
>  			*ppoints = points;

Looks good to be

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL