All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Abd-El-Malek <mabdelmalek@cmu.edu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Vanilla Linux 64-bit paravirt guest support
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:14:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FD942C.5040503@cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47FBE3CF.4000107@goop.org>

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Michael Abd-El-Malek wrote:
>> Can someone tell me what the status of 64-bit paravirtualization 
>> support is in the vanilla Linux tree?  It seems that 2.6.24 only has 
>> 32-bit PV support.  And it seems that 2.6.25 will be getting 64-bit PV 
>> support.  Will it be complete?
> 
> No, 2.6.25 will not have 64-bit Xen support.  I'm hoping it will be 
> ready for .26.

Is 64-bit domU support available anywhere at the moment?  For example, what is 
the status of the git://git.et.redhat.com/xen-pvops-64.git tree?  I pulled that 
tree and tried building 64-bit Xen domU support (since this tree allows you to 
configure the kernel with that capability, unlike the vanilla Linux tree).  But 
compilation failed in enlighten.c because xen_smp_ops isn't defined in x86_64.

>> On a related note: is it possible to compile the PV network/block 
>> drivers for a HVM Linux guest with the newest kernels?  Compilation 
>> failed and a previous message on the list says that you can't do 
>> that.  The reason I'd want to do this is to let me run a 64-bit recent 
>> Linux kernel with PV drivers. 
> 
> No, we don't support that for the moment, though it would be a useful 
> thing to have.

Is there a reason this wouldn't work, or is it just "scripting changes" that 
need to be done?

Thanks,
Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-10  4:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-08  4:20 Vanilla Linux 64-bit paravirt guest support Michael Abd-El-Malek
2008-04-08 21:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-10  4:14   ` Michael Abd-El-Malek [this message]
2008-04-10 14:01     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-10 14:11       ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-04-10 14:25         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-10 14:40           ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-04-10 15:04             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-19 15:11               ` Bastian Blank
2008-04-10 14:32         ` Michael Abd-El-Malek
2008-04-10 14:49           ` Mark McLoughlin
2008-04-10 14:57           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-10 15:06             ` Fix a typo in p2m.c Huang2, Wei
2008-04-10 15:14             ` Vanilla Linux 64-bit paravirt guest support Michael Abd-El-Malek
2008-04-10 15:40               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-06 16:22         ` Mark McLoughlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47FD942C.5040503@cmu.edu \
    --to=mabdelmalek@cmu.edu \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.