From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC8DDE2D7 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:25:27 +1000 (EST) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g16so31436nfd.9 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:25:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47FE3160.2060907@genesi-usa.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:25:20 +0100 From: Matt Sealey MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marian Balakowicz Subject: Re: State of the MPC5200 PSC AC97 driver References: <47FDEF9B.5000506@semihalf.com> In-Reply-To: <47FDEF9B.5000506@semihalf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: Matt Sealey Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Sylvain Munaut , spitzauer_77@gmx.de List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I have a copy of the driver I hacked to work with the new PSC framework but it doesn't "work" anymore - I have no idea why. Mail me privately if you want it, I have no time to make patches or look for a good reason for the breakages, but it compiles at least. The Efika hack should be gone now (irrelevant since we released a firmware that obseletes it) and the other fixmes should be by the wayside considering the fscking thing doesn't play sound anymore... -- Matt Sealey Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations Marian Balakowicz wrote: > Hi Sylvain, > > Last year you have posted a MPC5200 PSC AC97 driver patch > "[PATCH 9/9] sound: Add support for Freescale MPC5200 AC97 interface." > with the following comment: > >> Not quite a clean driver, but it get things done (well, mostly). >> Only included to be able to test functionalityi/usage of >> the BestComm driver. > > There are various FIXMEs and commented out code here and there. > Could you elaborate a bit on the overall state of the driver's > functionality, > which areas need improvement and attention? > > Seems that you mainly tested BestComm with this driver, what was the > overall > BestComm performance, any issues here? Did you use any specific test setup > involving some dedicated application, etc.? > > Did anyone else tried it and/or has a updated version or can share > experience? > > Thanks in advance. > > Cheers, > m.