From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jk9VC-00069i-T6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:00:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jk9VA-00067b-95 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:00:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jk9VA-00067Y-4P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:00:32 -0400 Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jk9VA-000506-4n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:00:32 -0400 Message-ID: <47FED44B.4050705@cyberbotx.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:00:27 -0400 From: Naram Qashat MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.9.1 CPU halting with Windows 2000 Pro guest References: <47FCF3A7.5010602@cyberbotx.com> <47FEB90B.5040900@cyberbotx.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > Hi... > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Naram Qashat wrote: >> I looked through the archives for the last week or so and I can't seem to >> find the thread in question. Could you either point me to the thread or sum >> it up for me? > > hm...try : > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-04/msg00101.html Ah, I did see that one, but it's not the same issue I'm running in to. I am able to exit QEMU just fine without the process hanging. It's just that it halts the actual emulated CPU and I can't see a reason why. When I was running FreeBSD 6.3, I was running a UP kernel, and with FreeBSD 7.0, I'm running an SMP kernel, but the issue was the same with both versions. I don't recall if it used to happen before, but I believe it may have started with QEMU 0.9.0, but don't quote me on that, I may be wrong. > regards, > > Mulyadi. Thanks, Naram Qashat