From: Muneendra Kumar M <muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com>
To: Erwin van Londen <erwin@erwinvanlonden.net>,
Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com>,
bblock@linux.ibm.com, hare@suse.de
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] dm-multipath - IO queue dispatch based on FPIN Congestion/Latency notifications.
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 11:00:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47a0bf4bb540f052625afeb78ce6e592@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6c3e5c7682d209263de5ca3612228b9468051a2.camel@erwinvanlonden.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3606 bytes --]
Hi Erwin,
Below are my replies.
On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 10:16 +0000, Martin Wilck wrote:
On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 12:48 +1000, Erwin van Londen wrote:
Benjamin has added a marginal_path group(multipath marginal
pathgroups) in
the dm-multipath.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dm-devel/cover/1564763622-31752-1-git
-send-email-bmarzins@redhat.com/
One of the intention of the Benjamin's patch (support for maginal
path) is
to support for the FPIN events we receive from fabric.
On receiving the fpin-li our intention was to place all the paths
that
are affected into the marginal path group.
I think this should all be done in kernel space as we're talking sub-
millisecond timings here when it comes to fpins and the reaction time
expected. I may be wrong but I'll leave that up to you.
Sub-ms latency is impossible with this setup (kernel -> broadcom FC
daemon -> multipathd -> kernel). It's only suitable for "fatal" FPINs
that would suggest taking a path offline on the time scale of minutes.
I suppose that would work well for LN FPINs, but not for the other
types.
>>I agree. I was hoping the FC drivers would be able to play a role in this
and provide a direct hook into the FPIN notifications in such a way that
userspace daemons would not be required and multipath would >>be able to
play a direct role here.
>>When it comes to latency in a san we're indeed talking about sub-ms when
it comes to impacting other parts of the fabrics having an immediate effect
on multiple initiators and targets due to the shared nature >>of the beast.
>>
On receiving the congestion notifications our intention is to
slowdown the
work load gradually from the host until it stops receiving the
congestion
notifications.
We need to validate the same how we can achieve the same of
decreasing the
workloads with the help of dm-multipath.
Would it be possible to piggyback on the service time path selector
in this when it pertains latency?
Not on service-time itself, but someone could write a new path selector
algorithm. IMO we'd still have the problem that this would be seen as a
layering violation. In the long run dm-mpath may need to add transport-
specific callbacks. But for a proof-of-concept, a selector algorithm
with layering violations would be ok, I believe.
>>Is that an offer of volunteering?? [image: :-)]
[Muneendra]To address all the issues we are planning to come up with new
dm-path selector algorithm which should address
the above concerns where FC drivers will do a direct hook into the FPIN
notifications in such a way that userspace daemons would not be required
and multipath would be able to play a
direct role here.
Will come up with more details regarding the new dm-path selector algorithm
for FPIN notifications.
Regards,
Muneendra.
--
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error,
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and
destroy any printed copy of it.
[-- Attachment #1.1.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 8831 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: image001.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 871 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4220 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 97 bytes --]
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-06 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-23 7:52 [dm-devel] dm-multipath - IO queue dispatch based on FPIN Congestion/Latency notifications Erwin van Londen
2021-03-25 16:07 ` Benjamin Block
2021-03-26 11:15 ` Muneendra Kumar M
2021-03-31 0:22 ` Erwin van Londen
2021-03-31 7:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-31 8:12 ` Erwin van Londen
2021-03-31 9:57 ` Martin Wilck
2021-03-31 10:48 ` Muneendra Kumar M
2021-03-31 11:45 ` Martin Wilck
2021-03-31 11:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-31 11:57 ` Muneendra Kumar M
2021-03-31 12:41 ` Martin Wilck
2021-04-01 2:48 ` Erwin van Londen
2021-04-01 10:16 ` Martin Wilck
2021-04-01 22:04 ` Erwin van Londen
2021-04-05 5:30 ` Muneendra Kumar M [this message]
2021-04-05 5:55 ` Erwin van Londen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47a0bf4bb540f052625afeb78ce6e592@mail.gmail.com \
--to=muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=erwin@erwinvanlonden.net \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=martin.wilck@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.