From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, akpm@osdl.org
Cc: NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RESEND 8390: Split 8390 support into a pausing and a non pausing driver core
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:46:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48069DE1.7080301@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080119155817.326ee5e0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Alan Cox wrote:
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc8-mm1/drivers/net/8390p.c 2008-01-19 15:00:41.000000000 +0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> +/* 8390 core for ISA devices needing bus delays */
> +
> +static const char version[] =
> + "8390p.c:v1.10cvs 9/23/94 Donald Becker (becker@cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov)\n";
> +
> +#define ei_inb(_p) inb(_p)
> +#define ei_outb(_v,_p) outb(_v,_p)
> +#define ei_inb_p(_p) inb_p(_p)
> +#define ei_outb_p(_v,_p) outb_p(_v,_p)
> +
> +#include "lib8390.c"
> +
> +int eip_open(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + return __ei_open(dev);
> +}
> +
> +int eip_close(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + return __ei_close(dev);
> +}
> +
> +irqreturn_t eip_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + return __ei_interrupt(irq, dev_id);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> +void eip_poll(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + __ei_poll(dev);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +struct net_device *__alloc_eip_netdev(int size)
> +{
> + return ____alloc_ei_netdev(size);
> +}
> +
> +void NS8390p_init(struct net_device *dev, int startp)
> +{
> + return __NS8390_init(dev, startp);
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(eip_open);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(eip_close);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(eip_interrupt);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(eip_poll);
> +#endif
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(NS8390p_init);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__alloc_eip_netdev);
> +
> +#if defined(MODULE)
> +
> +int init_module(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void cleanup_module(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* MODULE */
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Now that this has seen a bit of testing, and accumulated some fix
patches in -mm, can I get a roll-up of all those into a single patch?
Looks OK to me. My one minor comment is that I would think the
init_module() would be superfluous?
Jeff
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-17 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080119155817.326ee5e0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
2008-04-17 0:46 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2008-04-17 1:05 ` [PATCH] RESEND 8390: Split 8390 support into a pausing and a non pausing driver core Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 5:32 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48069DE1.7080301@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.