From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756621AbYDRAkD (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:40:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752838AbYDRAjw (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:39:52 -0400 Received: from sandeen.net ([209.173.210.139]:26315 "EHLO sandeen.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750915AbYDRAjv (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:39:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4807EDD6.8000705@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:39:50 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denys Fedoryshchenko CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25 released with bug, which leads to XFS crash? References: <200804170949.36864.denys@visp.net.lb> In-Reply-To: <200804170949.36864.denys@visp.net.lb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > Hi again > > I reported about http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10421 , and it is triggerable on different loaded servers with XFS (squid with aufs), Oh, aufs was not listed in the bug report. that's an out of tree module, right? Is it completely up to date and safe with 2.6.25? -Eric