From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D008DE89E for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:12:07 +1000 (EST) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id q7so114835uge.0 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:12:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4808E469.9020408@genesi-usa.com> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:11:53 +0100 From: Matt Sealey MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juergen Beisert Subject: Re: RFC: MPC5200 PSC AC97 driver References: <47FDEF9B.5000506@semihalf.com> <200804171619.56615.jbe@pengutronix.de> <4808C1BE.1050607@fang.fa.gau.hu> <200804181802.34833.jbe@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <200804181802.34833.jbe@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: Matt Sealey Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Juergen Beisert wrote: > On Friday 18 April 2008 17:43, Peter Czanik wrote: > I'm not sure if "cell-index" is a correct property. I copied it from the uart > driver, because this driver needs something to distinguish between PSC1 and > PSC2. Maybe there is a better and correct oftree solution? Any oftree expert > here? cell-index is correct by legacy, but I think it has been said by that you could just as well pick which PSC you are running on by it's address. I would prefer the address approach, but everyone's going to keep cell-index around anyway so why not leave it there and why not keep using it? -- Matt Sealey Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations