From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m3K9GBCr008411 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 05:16:12 -0400 Received: from ian.pickworth.me.uk (ian.pickworth.me.uk [81.187.248.227]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3K9FW0j002078 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 05:15:33 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ian.pickworth.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90722121C620 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:15:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from ian.pickworth.me.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ian.pickworth.me.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9vEYqOHAGHzP for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:15:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (ian2.pickworth.me.uk [192.168.1.11]) by ian.pickworth.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F35A94B9F for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:15:25 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <480B09A9.20204@pickworth.me.uk> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:15:21 +0100 From: Ian Pickworth MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Linux and Kernel Video References: <480A5CC3.6030408@pickworth.me.uk> <1208652474.14680.8.camel@pc10.localdom.local> In-Reply-To: <1208652474.14680.8.camel@pc10.localdom.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Hauppauge WinTV regreession from 2.6.24 to 2.6.25 Reply-To: ian@pickworth.me.uk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: (Should have posted CC to the list - I really am rusty! sorry.) Hello Hermann, hermann pitton wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Am Samstag, den 19.04.2008, 21:57 +0100 schrieb Ian Pickworth: >> I am testing a kernel upgrade from 2.6.24.to 2.6.25, and the drivers for the Hauppauge WinTV appear to have suffered some regression between the two kernel versions. ...... > nice to hear from you! Likewise! Same old gang on cx88 then :-) . > > I don't have that tuner in any box currently and the variant I had was > always a _little_ bit critical in standard PCI slots. > > Ian, are you sure that it is the released 2.6.25 showing that? I'm not sure how to pin down the version Gentoo provides. The syslog on bootup says: Linux version 2.6.25-gentoo (root@ian2) (gcc version 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.0.2)) #1 PREEMPT Sat Apr 19 09:29:59 BST 2008 The gentoo-sources changelog doesn't say which version of the Kernel they picked up to make the release. I can see from the package manifest that they use linux-2.6.25.tar.bz2 as the base source, but then apply patches to make the Gentoo release. I've dug around the drivers/media/video/cx88 source a bit, but all the version comments appear to be stripped out. Gentoo usually provide a "masked" version of the kernel for several iterations before making it "stable" in their package tree, so I would guess that this is probably an early kernel source release, if that helps. I'm a bit rusty at this stuff, sorry. > > Than we should have some alert around. > > Cheers, > Hermann > I'd be happy to do whatever is needed to pin down the problem. As I say though, I am a bit rusty. If you tell me what to do I'll have a go. Thanks Regards Ian -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list