From: Charles Marcus <CMarcus@Media-Brokers.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Adding PVs to a group
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:42:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <480B728C.9010708@Media-Brokers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <480AB63C.4070605@gmail.com>
On 4/19/2008, David Robinson (zxvdr.au@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Since I'm no longer using the second partition at all, wouldn't it
>> be simpler/cleaner to just delete the second partition entirely
>> (using fdisk) and then just resize /dev/sdb1 to include the new free
>> space using vgextend?
>>
>> Or will that not work?
> That will work. You'll need to run pvresize after resizing the
> partition, and you wouldn't need to use vgextend.
Thanks for taking the time to hold my hand a little through this David...
OT: this list seems a little on the dead side... is there a more active
LVM oriented list that you are aware of?
Anyway...
Ok, so I guess the only question I have is - does it matter?
Is my following evaluation correct? :
It is much simpler - because I can do this without rebooting - to just do:
vgextend vg2 /dev/sdb2, then
lvextend -L+100G /dev/vg2/var, then
resize_reiserfs -f /dev/vg2/var
than it is to:
delete /dev/sdb2, reboot, then
resize /dev/sdb1, reboot, then
run pvresize, *then*
run lvextend...
So, again - does it really matter? Is having my vg2 in one big LVM
partition 'better' than having it consist of two different partitions?
I'm thinking it does *not* matter, so will most likely go with the
first/easiest option, unless you (or someone else) provides a good
reason to take option 2...
Thanks again,
--
Best regards,
Charles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-20 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-18 21:45 [linux-lvm] Adding PVs to a group Charles Marcus
2008-04-18 21:51 ` Charles Marcus
2008-04-19 0:18 ` dave
2008-04-21 10:16 ` Bryn M. Reeves
2008-04-21 12:51 ` Charles Marcus
2008-04-19 17:57 ` Charles Marcus
2008-04-20 3:19 ` David Robinson
2008-04-20 16:42 ` Charles Marcus [this message]
2008-04-20 22:40 ` David Robinson
2008-04-21 10:04 ` Charles Marcus
2008-04-21 0:22 ` Ross Boylan
2008-04-21 10:06 ` Charles Marcus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=480B728C.9010708@Media-Brokers.com \
--to=cmarcus@media-brokers.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.