From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, akpm@osdl.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86 NMI-safe INT3 and Page Fault (v5)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:28:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <480CCEB0.8040401@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080421172327.GA32278@elf.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>> There is also the page fault case. I think putting this test in
>> ret_from_exception would be both safe (it is executed for any
>> exception return) and fast (exceptions are rare).
>
> Eh? I thought that page fault is one of the hottest paths in kernel
> (along with syscall and packet receive/send)...
> Pavel
Yeah, and the concept of handling page faults inside an NMI handler is
pure fantasy.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-21 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080417165839.GA25198@Krystal>
[not found] ` <20080417165944.GB25198@Krystal>
2008-04-17 20:14 ` [RFC PATCH] x86 NMI-safe INT3 and Page Fault (v5) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-17 20:29 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 21:16 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-17 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 22:01 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-18 0:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-18 8:07 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-19 21:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-18 11:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-19 21:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-21 14:00 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-21 14:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-21 14:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-21 15:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-21 15:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-21 15:21 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-21 15:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-21 17:23 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-21 17:28 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-04-21 17:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-21 17:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-22 13:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-04-21 15:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=480CCEB0.8040401@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.