From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <480DB1B5.10700@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:36:53 +0200 From: Roland Stigge MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <480A4F7F.4000909@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <480A4F7F.4000909@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] warning: symlink-is-self-recursive List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org Hi, Roland Stigge wrote: > ========================================================================= > W: libxenomai-dev: symlink-is-self-recursive > usr/include/xenomai/asm-generic/xenomai . > N: > N: The symbolic link is recursive to a higher directory of the symlink > N: itself. This means, that you can infinitely chdir with this symlink. > N: This is usually not okay, but sometimes wanted behaviour. > N: > W: libxenomai-dev: symlink-is-self-recursive > usr/include/xenomai/asm-sim/asm . > W: libxenomai-dev: symlink-is-self-recursive > usr/include/xenomai/asm-sim/xenomai . > W: libxenomai-dev: symlink-is-self-recursive > usr/include/xenomai/asm-x86/xenomai . > W: libxenomai-dev: symlink-is-self-recursive usr/include/xenomai/xenomai . > ========================================================================= > > I.e. installing Xenomai created those recursive links which might be > there for source compatibility reasons. Can they be removed at some > point or should I accept the above issue as intended for the future? No comment from anyone? Maybe I should detect the necessity for those links by removing and seeing if anyone complains? ;-) bye, Roland