All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Modifying sensors-detect: add DMI support
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:29:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <480E2071.80606@hhs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <480E1FA6.1090106@gmail.com>

Ivo Manca wrote:
> Hey Jean, Hans,
> 
> As you both know, I've submitted some patches which add DMI support to 
> lm-sensors quite a while ago. For reference, they can be found at: 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.sensors/13793
> 
> I believe the main reason these patches have not been included yet, is 
> (besides the usual lack of time) the fact that there is not yet a 
> website available. As discussed in this thread 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.sensors/14562 , Hans 
> suggested using the wiki pages as a first version.
> 
> Even though I would prefer a dedicated website, I now do believe that 
> Hans is right, and modifying the wiki's and add DMI information to the 
> configurations there, might be a good way to get 'the ball rolling'. 
> Once it starts to get popular, we can switch to a dedicated website.
> 
> I believe that making one is not too hard of a job (it's not rocket 
> science after all..) and I've already made a begin for it. However, for 
> the time being, I would rather spend my time on respinning and revising 
> the previous patches and writing an (obviously) relative easy script 
> that's able to walk through the wiki and fetch the configuration files 
> from there.
> 
> If it’s possible to add the needed information to these entries, I’m 
> more than willing to get working on the mentioned parts
> 
> For now, all I really need is the following information for the 
> configurations:
> * needed modules
> * dmi information: system-manufacturer, system-product-name, 
> system-version, baseboard-manufacturer, baseboard-product-name, 
> baseboard-version,
> 
> I suppose that should do it. I don’t really have a strong favor of how 
> this information is added, but I would suggest it to be something like:
> 
> # modprobe module1 parameter1 parameter2 parameter3
> # modprobe module2
> # system-manufacturer PCCHIPS
> 

+1

I have dmi info for quite a few motherboards for which we already have cfg 
files on the wiki, sitting in my mailbox, so if we can agree on a format to add 
the DMI info (as comments) to the .cfg file snippets, then I'll add that asap.

Thanks & Regards,

Hans

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

      reply	other threads:[~2008-04-22 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-22 17:25 [lm-sensors] Modifying sensors-detect: add DMI support Ivo Manca
2008-04-22 17:29 ` Hans de Goede [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=480E2071.80606@hhs.nl \
    --to=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
    --cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.