From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs-dev <xfs-dev@sgi.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix check for block zero access in xfs_write_iomap_allocate
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:06:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <480EB5CE.90001@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080422110210.GZ103491721@sgi.com>
Looks good.
David Chinner wrote:
> Fix check for block zero access in xfs_write_iomap_allocate
>
> The check for block zero access should be done on non-realtime
> inodes. Fix the logic error in xfs_write_iomap_allocate(), and
> simplify the logic on all checks for block zero access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 13 +++++--------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Index: 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.x-xfs-new.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c 2008-04-22 11:54:54.000000000 +1000
> +++ 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c 2008-04-22 20:45:53.469961429 +1000
> @@ -523,8 +523,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_direct(
> goto error_out;
> }
>
> - if (unlikely(!imap.br_startblock &&
> - !(XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)))) {
> + if (!(imap.br_startblock || XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip))) {
> error = xfs_cmn_err_fsblock_zero(ip, &imap);
> goto error_out;
> }
> @@ -686,8 +685,7 @@ retry:
> goto retry;
> }
>
> - if (unlikely(!imap[0].br_startblock &&
> - !(XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip))))
> + if (!(imap[0].br_startblock || XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)))
> return xfs_cmn_err_fsblock_zero(ip, &imap[0]);
>
> *ret_imap = imap[0];
> @@ -838,9 +836,9 @@ xfs_iomap_write_allocate(
> * See if we were able to allocate an extent that
> * covers at least part of the callers request
> */
> - if (unlikely(!imap.br_startblock &&
> - XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)))
> + if (!(imap.br_startblock || XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)))
> return xfs_cmn_err_fsblock_zero(ip, &imap);
> +
> if ((offset_fsb >= imap.br_startoff) &&
> (offset_fsb < (imap.br_startoff +
> imap.br_blockcount))) {
> @@ -934,8 +932,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(
> if (error)
> return XFS_ERROR(error);
>
> - if (unlikely(!imap.br_startblock &&
> - !(XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip))))
> + if (!(imap.br_startblock || XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)))
> return xfs_cmn_err_fsblock_zero(ip, &imap);
>
> if ((numblks_fsb = imap.br_blockcount) == 0) {
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-23 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-22 11:02 [PATCH] Fix check for block zero access in xfs_write_iomap_allocate David Chinner
2008-04-23 4:06 ` Lachlan McIlroy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=480EB5CE.90001@sgi.com \
--to=lachlan@sgi.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs-dev@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.