Re: [PATCH 0/4] io_uring: add IORING_OP_READ[WRITE]_SPLICE_BUF

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

On 2/10/23 10:13 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 02:54:29PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/10/23 8:32 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Add two OPs which buffer is retrieved via kernel splice for supporting
>>> fuse/ublk zero copy.
>>>
>>> The 1st patch enhances direct pipe & splice for moving pages in kernel,
>>> so that the two added OPs won't be misused, and avoid potential security
>>> hole.
>>>
>>> The 2nd patch allows splice_direct_to_actor() caller to ignore signal
>>> if the actor won't block and can be done in bound time.
>>>
>>> The 3rd patch add the two OPs.
>>>
>>> The 4th patch implements ublk's ->splice_read() for supporting
>>> zero copy.
>>>
>>> ublksrv(userspace):
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ming1/ubdsrv/commits/io_uring_splice_buf
>>>     
>>> So far, only loop/null target implements zero copy in above branch:
>>>     
>>> 	ublk add -t loop -f $file -z
>>> 	ublk add -t none -z
>>>
>>> Basic FS/IO function is verified, mount/kernel building & fio
>>> works fine, and big chunk IO(BS: 64k/512k) performance gets improved
>>> obviously.
>>
>> Do you have any performance numbers?
> 
> Simple test on ublk-loop over image in btrfs shows the improvement is
> 100% ~ 200%.

That is pretty tasty...

>> Also curious on liburing regression
>> tests, would be nice to see as it helps with review.
> 
> It isn't easy since it requires ublk device so far, it looks like
> read to/write from one device buffer.

It can't be tested without ublk itself? Surely the two new added ops can
have separate test cases?

-- 
Jens Axboe