All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Michael Darling <darlingm@gmail.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS drops create/delete files to 6.6% of EXT3 (software raid) and to 0.6% of EXT3 (3ware hardware raid)
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:01:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4810062F.50100@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c33e4330804231848n72ce683cqd48a8d45937f302@mail.gmail.com>

Michael Darling wrote:
> I am preparing a new server, and benchmarking EXT3 against XFS, both using
> software RAID and hardware RAID using a 3ware 9650SE-4LPML.
> 
> Using bonnie++ as a benchmark, I am seeing significant performance boosts in
> my block sequential reads and writes moving from EXT3 to XFS.  I am aware
> that XFS won't create and delete files as quickly as EXT3, however I am
> seeing drops from 29455/second to 1957/second using software RAID, and from
> 32524/second to 189/second using hardware RAID.  I'm not sure if when using
> software raid, if creating and deleting files should drop to 6.6% of EXT3.
> But, what I'm pretty sure of, is when using hardware raid, that creating and
> deleting files shouldn't drop to 0.6% of EXT3.

So I played with this a little on 2.6.25, on plain partitions.

I saw similar numbers; for example, sequential creates:

ext3:		23698/s
xfs:		  319/s
xfs,nobarrier:	 4478/s


then on a whim I tried an external log on a devicemapper zero target :)

xfs,fakelog:	15156/s

Others can probably wax eloquent as to why xfs is slower on this test,
but it's not unique to your setup, at least.

-Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-24  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-24  1:48 XFS drops create/delete files to 6.6% of EXT3 (software raid) and to 0.6% of EXT3 (3ware hardware raid) Michael Darling
2008-04-24  4:01 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-04-24  5:33   ` David Chinner
2008-04-24  6:23     ` Michael Darling
2008-04-24  6:31       ` David Chinner
2008-04-24 15:39         ` Michael Darling
2008-04-24 12:49       ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-24 14:20         ` Justin Piszcz
2008-04-24 14:57           ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-24 17:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-25 14:54   ` Michael Darling
2008-04-26 15:23 ` Emmanuel Florac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4810062F.50100@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=darlingm@gmail.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.