From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <48105D6F.8040603@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:14:07 +0200 From: Wolfgang Grandegger MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4810488D.9030909@domain.hid> <27116705.1209018431019.JavaMail.ngmail@domain.hid> <31638452.1209029143484.JavaMail.ngmail@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <31638452.1209029143484.JavaMail.ngmail@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Current state of RTDM-native? List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "M. Koehrer" Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org, rtnet-users@domain.hid M. Koehrer wrote: > Hello Wolfgang, > >> I do not know of any activities, but it should not be a big effort to >> get RTnet ported over RTDM-native. As I see it, mainly the build system >> of RTnet needs adaption. >> > thanks for your response. That sounds very good. > I can remember, that a long while ago, the interrupt handling was not realized yet with rtdm-native > which is necessary to get rtnet up and running. > Is this implemented now? I'm not sure what you mean. RTDM-native has been tested with RT-Socket-CAN, which uses interrupts, of course. While reading my old README http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/xenomai/branches/rtdm-native/README.rtdm-native?rev=2386&view=auto I now remember some more quirks, especially with tasks termination, which might be problematic with RTnet. Maybe a RTDM port over Xenomai-Solo would be more straight forward, but that's another project. Wolfgang.