From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Xenomai-core@domain.hid
Subject: [Xenomai-core] [2.4.x PATCH] POSIX: Remove mutex/cond_init locking, fix NULL attribute
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:59:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4811D596.8070109@domain.hid> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 365 bytes --]
Hi,
trunk check-in #3369 did not just remove some "questionable critical
sections", it also happen to fix two ugly bugs in the POSIX skin: The
user was not able to pass NULL attributes down to mutex_init and
cond_init. Find a backport of that patch for 2.4.x attached.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
[-- Attachment #2: cond-mutex-init-fix-NULL-attr-and-remove-critical-sections.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 5391 bytes --]
Index: xenomai-2.4.x/ksrc/skins/posix/syscall.c
===================================================================
--- xenomai-2.4.x/ksrc/skins/posix/syscall.c (Revision 3722)
+++ xenomai-2.4.x/ksrc/skins/posix/syscall.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -420,7 +420,6 @@ static int __sem_init(struct task_struct
union __xeno_sem sm, *usm;
unsigned value;
int pshared;
- spl_t s;
usm = (union __xeno_sem *)__xn_reg_arg1(regs);
@@ -431,24 +430,18 @@ static int __sem_init(struct task_struct
pshared = (int)__xn_reg_arg2(regs);
value = (unsigned)__xn_reg_arg3(regs);
- xnlock_get_irqsave(&nklock, s);
-
__xn_copy_from_user(curr,
&sm.shadow_sem,
(void __user *)&usm->shadow_sem,
sizeof(sm.shadow_sem));
- if (sem_init(&sm.native_sem, pshared, value) == -1) {
- xnlock_put_irqrestore(&nklock, s);
+ if (sem_init(&sm.native_sem, pshared, value) == -1)
return -thread_get_errno();
- }
__xn_copy_to_user(curr,
(void __user *)&usm->shadow_sem,
&sm.shadow_sem, sizeof(usm->shadow_sem));
- xnlock_put_irqrestore(&nklock, s);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -1080,7 +1073,6 @@ static int __pthread_mutex_init(struct t
{
pthread_mutexattr_t locattr, *attr, *uattrp;
union __xeno_mutex mx, *umx;
- spl_t s;
int err;
umx = (union __xeno_mutex *)__xn_reg_arg1(regs);
@@ -1091,19 +1083,16 @@ static int __pthread_mutex_init(struct t
(curr, VERIFY_WRITE, (void __user *)umx, sizeof(*umx)))
return -EFAULT;
- if (!__xn_access_ok
- (curr, VERIFY_READ, (void __user *)uattrp, sizeof(*uattrp)))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- /* We want the initialization to be atomic. */
- xnlock_get_irqsave(&nklock, s);
-
__xn_copy_from_user(curr,
&mx.shadow_mutex,
(void __user *)&umx->shadow_mutex,
sizeof(mx.shadow_mutex));
if (uattrp) {
+ if (!__xn_access_ok
+ (curr, VERIFY_READ, (void __user *)uattrp, sizeof(*uattrp)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
__xn_copy_from_user(curr,
&locattr,(void __user *)
uattrp,
@@ -1115,17 +1104,13 @@ static int __pthread_mutex_init(struct t
err = pthread_mutex_init(&mx.native_mutex, attr);
- if (err) {
- xnlock_put_irqrestore(&nklock, s);
+ if (err)
return -err;
- }
__xn_copy_to_user(curr,
(void __user *)&umx->shadow_mutex,
&mx.shadow_mutex, sizeof(umx->shadow_mutex));
- xnlock_put_irqrestore(&nklock, s);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -1134,7 +1119,6 @@ static int __pthread_mutex_destroy(struc
{
union __xeno_mutex mx, *umx;
int err;
- spl_t s;
umx = (union __xeno_mutex *)__xn_reg_arg1(regs);
@@ -1142,8 +1126,6 @@ static int __pthread_mutex_destroy(struc
(curr, VERIFY_READ, (void __user *)umx, sizeof(*umx)))
return -EFAULT;
- xnlock_get_irqsave(&nklock, s);
-
__xn_copy_from_user(curr,
&mx.shadow_mutex,
(void __user *)&umx->shadow_mutex,
@@ -1151,17 +1133,13 @@ static int __pthread_mutex_destroy(struc
err = pthread_mutex_destroy(&mx.native_mutex);
- if (err) {
- xnlock_put_irqrestore(&nklock, s);
+ if (err)
return -err;
- }
__xn_copy_to_user(curr,
(void __user *)&umx->shadow_mutex,
&mx.shadow_mutex, sizeof(umx->shadow_mutex));
- xnlock_put_irqrestore(&nklock, s);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -1410,7 +1388,6 @@ static int __pthread_cond_init(struct ta
{
pthread_condattr_t locattr, *attr, *uattrp;
union __xeno_cond cnd, *ucnd;
- spl_t s;
int err;
ucnd = (union __xeno_cond *)__xn_reg_arg1(regs);
@@ -1421,19 +1398,16 @@ static int __pthread_cond_init(struct ta
(curr, VERIFY_WRITE, (void __user *)ucnd, sizeof(*ucnd)))
return -EFAULT;
- if (!__xn_access_ok
- (curr, VERIFY_READ, (void __user *)uattrp, sizeof(*uattrp)))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- /* We want the initialization to be atomic. */
- xnlock_get_irqsave(&nklock, s);
-
__xn_copy_from_user(curr,
&cnd.shadow_cond,
(void __user *)&ucnd->shadow_cond,
sizeof(cnd.shadow_cond));
if (uattrp) {
+ if (!__xn_access_ok
+ (curr, VERIFY_READ, (void __user *)uattrp, sizeof(*uattrp)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
__xn_copy_from_user(curr,
&locattr,
(void __user *)uattrp,
@@ -1443,20 +1417,15 @@ static int __pthread_cond_init(struct ta
} else
attr = NULL;
- /* Always use default attribute. */
err = pthread_cond_init(&cnd.native_cond, attr);
- if (err) {
- xnlock_put_irqrestore(&nklock, s);
+ if (err)
return -err;
- }
__xn_copy_to_user(curr,
(void __user *)&ucnd->shadow_cond,
&cnd.shadow_cond, sizeof(ucnd->shadow_cond));
- xnlock_put_irqrestore(&nklock, s);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -1465,7 +1434,6 @@ static int __pthread_cond_destroy(struct
{
union __xeno_cond cnd, *ucnd;
int err;
- spl_t s;
ucnd = (union __xeno_cond *)__xn_reg_arg1(regs);
@@ -1473,8 +1441,6 @@ static int __pthread_cond_destroy(struct
(curr, VERIFY_READ, (void __user *)ucnd, sizeof(*ucnd)))
return -EFAULT;
- xnlock_get_irqsave(&nklock, s);
-
__xn_copy_from_user(curr,
&cnd.shadow_cond,
(void __user *)&ucnd->shadow_cond,
@@ -1482,17 +1448,13 @@ static int __pthread_cond_destroy(struct
err = pthread_cond_destroy(&cnd.native_cond);
- if (err) {
- xnlock_put_irqrestore(&nklock, s);
+ if (err)
return -err;
- }
__xn_copy_to_user(curr,
(void __user *)&ucnd->shadow_cond,
&cnd.shadow_cond, sizeof(ucnd->shadow_cond));
- xnlock_put_irqrestore(&nklock, s);
-
return 0;
}
next reply other threads:[~2008-04-25 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-25 12:59 Jan Kiszka [this message]
2008-04-25 13:12 ` [Xenomai-core] [2.4.x PATCH] POSIX: Remove mutex/cond_init locking, fix NULL attribute Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-04-25 13:44 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-04-25 13:46 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-04-25 14:00 ` Philippe Gerum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4811D596.8070109@domain.hid \
--to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=Xenomai-core@domain.hid \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.