Re: [PATCH v3] test: fix missing NULL pointer checks

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

2015-02-10 11:46, Bruce Richardson:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:18:19AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-01-27 13:06, Neil Horman:
> > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 04:44:53PM +0100, Daniel Mrzyglod wrote:
> > > > In test_sched, we are missing NULL pointer checks after create_mempool()
> > > > and rte_pktmbuf_alloc(). Add in these checks using TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL macros.
> > > > 
> > > > VERIFY macro was removed and replaced by standard test ASSERTS from "test.h" header.
> > > > This provides additional information to track when the failure occured.
> > > > 
> > > > v3 changes:
> > > > - remove VERIFY macro
> > > > - fix spelling error.
> > > > - change unproper comment
> > > > 
> > > > v2 changes:
> > > > - Replace all VERIFY macros instances by proper TEST_ASSERT* macros.
> > > > - fix description
> > > > 
> > > > v1 changes:
> > > > - first iteration of patch using VERIFY macro.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > >   
> > > These TEST_ASSERT macros are no better than the VERIFY macro, they contain
> > > exaxtly the same return issue that I outlined in my first post on the subject.
> > 
> > Neil, you are suggesting to rework the assert macros of the unit tests.
> > It should be another patch.
> > Here, Daniel is improving the sched test with existing macros.
> > I think it should be applied.
> >
> 
> +1
> I agree with Thomas here. Having looked at the V4 patch, I believe this V3 is
> better, and that other cleanup should be done in separate patches.

Applied, thanks