From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ata_std_qc_defer not good enough for FIS-based switching ?
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:17:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48175812.7000106@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48175664.5030702@rtr.ca>
Mark Lord wrote:
..
> For the first time ever, I can now *heavily* mix PIO commands
> with NCQ/non-NCQ DMA commands, to drives on an attached PM
> (well, two attached PMs even), and the thing doesn't croak.
> Woo-hoo!
..
Here is the simple torture test I'm using for this.
It might be fun for others to try something similar on the other LLDs
which have PMP support:
1. QuadCore CPU, with 4GB of RAM (lots of simultaneous threads).
2. In one window, do this (lots of overlapping PIO commands):
while ( true ) ; do for d in /dev/sd? ; do bash -c "hdparm -C $d &" ; done ; sleep 0.1 ; done
3. In a second window, do this (lots of overlapping DMA/NCQ reads):
while (true) ; do for d in /dev/sd? ; do bash -c "hdparm -t $d &" ; done ; sleep 6 ; done
Or something like that.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-29 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-28 21:06 ata_std_qc_defer not good enough for FIS-based switching ? Mark Lord
2008-04-28 22:08 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-28 23:11 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-28 23:42 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-29 1:18 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-29 2:26 ` Mark Lord
2008-05-14 14:11 ` Tejun Heo
2008-05-14 14:45 ` Mark Lord
2008-05-14 14:53 ` Mark Lord
2008-05-14 15:50 ` Mark Lord
2008-05-14 15:59 ` Mark Lord
2008-05-15 7:12 ` Tejun Heo
2008-05-15 6:51 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-29 17:09 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-29 17:17 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2008-04-30 9:38 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-30 14:02 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48175812.7000106@rtr.ca \
--to=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.