From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] cfi_flash.c and lost volatile qualifier
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:16:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48179041.6080008@ge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0804291703010.13610@pmy.adscville>
Adrian Filipi wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> In message <alpine.DEB.1.10.0804291604250.32753@pmy.adscville> you wrote:
>>> I narrowed down the source of the problem to the loss of the
>>> volatile qualifier on the addr pointer in flash_write_cmd(). Adding the
>>> qualifier gets rid of the corruption. In the older 1.2.0 sources, addr was
>>> declared as "volatile cfiptr_t addr;".
>> The volatile should not be needed - the CFI driver should use correct
>> accessor macros instead. See
>> Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt in your Linux kernel
>> source tree...
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Wolfgang Denk
>
> Sure, reducing the reliance on volatile is a good idea, but I'm at
> a loss for anything better to do.
>
> I'm seeing a real problem that is only fixed by qualifying the
> container of the pointer as volatile, i.e. "void *volatile". "volatile
> void *" has no effect as expected given that the read/write accessors are
> used now.
>
> The old data type was essentially "volatile void *volatile addr"
> and the new type is simply "void *addr". I seem to need at least "void
> *volatile addr" for things to work.
>
> Note, I'm only seeing this problem on our PXA250 boards.
>
> Adrian
Hi Adrian,
Please bottom post.
It may be useful to disassemble cfi_flash.o file (objdump -S) and see
what the two different configurations of flash_write_cmd() get turned
into in assembly.
Best regards,
gvb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-29 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-08 14:32 [U-Boot-Users] drivers MMCplus for at91sam9x Pierre Savary
2008-04-09 17:49 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2008-04-10 10:32 ` Pierre Savary
2008-04-10 22:31 ` Ken.Fuchs at bench.com
2008-04-11 8:26 ` Pierre Savary
2008-04-11 15:48 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-04-11 18:54 ` Ken.Fuchs at bench.com
2008-04-12 9:28 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-04-15 10:18 ` Pierre Savary
2008-04-15 16:51 ` Ken.Fuchs at bench.com
[not found] ` <-6021840981243159212@unknownmsgid>
2008-04-15 19:25 ` Andy Fleming
2008-04-16 8:55 ` Pierre Savary
2008-04-16 23:30 ` Ken.Fuchs at bench.com
2008-04-22 11:55 ` Pierre Savary
2008-04-22 15:07 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add eSDHC driver Andy Fleming
2008-04-22 16:53 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-04-23 19:23 ` Ken.Fuchs at bench.com
2008-04-24 6:24 ` Pierre Savary
2008-04-29 19:45 ` [U-Boot-Users] drivers MMCplus for at91sam9x Ken.Fuchs at bench.com
2008-04-29 20:20 ` [U-Boot-Users] cfi_flash.c and lost volatile qualifier Adrian Filipi
2008-04-29 20:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-29 21:10 ` Adrian Filipi
2008-04-29 21:16 ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.0804300949360.13610@pmy.adscville>
2008-04-30 14:43 ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-04-30 15:11 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2008-04-30 15:21 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-30 15:34 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2008-04-30 15:41 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-30 16:02 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-30 16:11 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2008-04-30 15:35 ` [U-Boot-Users] PPC sync/eieio (was cfi_flash.c and lost volatile qualifier) Jerry Van Baren
2008-04-30 15:38 ` [U-Boot-Users] cfi_flash.c and lost volatile qualifier Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-30 15:51 ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-05-08 11:17 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-05-08 14:05 ` Adrian Filipi
2008-05-08 16:27 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-04-30 14:20 ` [U-Boot-Users] drivers MMCplus for at91sam9x Pierre Savary
2008-04-30 16:25 ` Ken.Fuchs at bench.com
2008-04-30 20:31 ` Ken.Fuchs at bench.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48179041.6080008@ge.com \
--to=gerald.vanbaren@ge.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.