From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Add cpu idle pwr mgmt to xen Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:25:12 +0100 Message-ID: <48186528.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser , Kevin Tian Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Gang Wei List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> Keir Fraser 30.04.08 12:00 >>> >Yes, I don't think we do partial copying anywhere right now. If we did, = we >could apply guest_handle_okay() checks explicitly before removing the >addr-space limitation. XENMEM_set_memory_map is one example where we do (valid here because the E820 layout is identical for 32- and 64-bits). >On the other hand, I don't think we have any hypercall right now where = 4kB >is likely to be too little space, and where the hypercall cannot be >sub-divided into smaller chunks by the compat shim. XENMEM_exchange and GNTTABOP_setup_table are examples for this. Jan