From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <481AE503.2060609@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 11:55:15 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <481AA6B5.9070508@domain.hid> <481AC93E.3030107@domain.hid> <481AD5C2.6030607@domain.hid> <481AD90C.2090902@domain.hid> <481AD9E5.4000102@domain.hid> <481AE18A.2070803@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <481AE18A.2070803@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] MSI Interrupt Crash List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: rpm@xenomai.org Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Philippe Gerum wrote: > PS: We really do want to call mask/unmask instead of disable/enable in any case, because ->disable() > became a nop in 2.6.21, so we just can't rely on its default action anyway. This is a separate > issue, that caused rthal_irq_disable() not to actually mask the interrupt when the I/O APIC is enabled. Hmmmm... That makes me scratch my head. Could this change have some impact on I-pipe as well? We are currently pulling hairs here as some SCSI adapter is flooding us with spurious IRQs during init, but only if I-pipe is enabled. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux