From: Pavel Hofman <pavel.hofman@insite.cz>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: MIDI on ice1724 - real-time kernel problem
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 21:12:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <481CB902.9080905@insite.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5htzhgub9a.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:07:42 +0200,
> Pavel Hofman wrote:
>> Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>> At Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:06:19 +0200,
>>> Pavel Hofman wrote:
>> The code works fine on standard kernel.
>>
>> But in the RT kernel of Ubuntu 7.10 (2.6.22-14-rt, 1000HZ compared to
>> 250HZ of the -generic kernel), MIDI interrupts get thrown continuously,
>> hogging CPU with the IRQXX "process".
>>
>> When playing 44.1kHz audio with buffer size of 32768,
>> snd_vt1724_interrupt is called every 185ms. With the buffer size of
>> 4096, it is every 23ms. So far so good.
>>
>> But when I try to output some midi, the routine gets called every 24us
>> (i.e. 1000 times faster). Comparing the time difference between my
>> several debug printk's in snd_vt1724_interrupt (approx. 5us between each
>> printk record a few lines of code apart) and between each call of the
>> method (24us), I thought there would be a loop somewhere in the
>> interrupt handler calling code. But /proc/interrupts really shows over
>> 40k interrupts a second for ICE1724.
>>
>> Changing the watermarks up to 0x1f makes no difference.
>
> That looks bad.
>
>> Masking the MIDI interrupts works, snd_vt1724_interrupt is called only
>> during VT1724_IRQ_MTPCM interrupts, with the MIDI status bits
>> MPU_TX/MPU_RX set when reading/writing with amidi.
>
> Hm, is it TX or RX, or in both cases?
> Could you check which one (TX or RX) causes this?
>
Both reading (amidi -p hw:0 -d) and writing (amidi -p hw:0 -S
F0411042110C000000000074FF0411042110C000000) starts the TX interrupt
flood (irq status: 0x20) immediately. Upon opening input as well as
output the method snd_mpu401_do_reset is called - is perhaps the culprit
somewhere there?
Thanks,
Pavel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-03 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-22 20:23 MIDI on ice1724 - preliminary findings and questions Pavel Hofman
2008-04-23 10:05 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-04-23 11:08 ` Pavel Hofman
2008-04-23 20:19 ` MIDI on ice1724 - long delays Pavel Hofman
2008-04-24 16:29 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-04-24 20:47 ` Pavel Hofman
2008-04-25 6:22 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-04-25 7:06 ` MIDI on ice1724 - fixing HG Pavel Hofman
2008-04-25 7:10 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-04-25 7:25 ` Pavel Hofman
2008-04-30 20:07 ` MIDI on ice1724 - real-time kernel problem Pavel Hofman
2008-05-02 12:43 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-03 19:12 ` Pavel Hofman [this message]
2008-05-07 10:25 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-08 19:35 ` Pavel Hofman
2008-05-15 7:21 ` Clemens Ladisch
2008-05-15 9:00 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-05-18 20:02 ` PATCH - MIDI on ice1724 - real-time kernel problem SOLVED Pavel Hofman
2008-05-20 8:44 ` Clemens Ladisch
2008-05-20 19:15 ` Pavel Hofman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=481CB902.9080905@insite.cz \
--to=pavel.hofman@insite.cz \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.