From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jt9OH-0000SL-2p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 18:42:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jt9OG-0000Ru-FX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 18:42:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53772 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jt9OG-0000Rp-B8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 18:42:36 -0400 Received: from [77.75.163.100] (helo=smtp.hotelhot.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jt9OG-0006iX-38 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 18:42:36 -0400 Message-ID: <481F8D57.40500@flac.kalibalik.dk> Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 00:42:31 +0200 From: Anders MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [4341] qemu: generate signals on tap I/O References: <481F84F3.6060505@flac.kalibalik.dk> <481F86F3.4080007@aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: <481F86F3.4080007@aurel32.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aurelien Jarno Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Aurelien Jarno wrote: > That's why I reverted that commit, it was for my local tree only, I > committed it accidentally (along with a few other patches). Ah, okay. I only read the subject of your reverts, which did not mention 4341. >> I posted a more complete implementation a few weeks ago, anything wrong >> with it? >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/24567 > > People saying it is not the way to go, and I have still haven't decided > myself if it is a correct solution or not. > The current code is also not a correct solution. Well, I will just keep it in my local tree. Cheers, Anders.