From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4820248A.3060406@domain.hid>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 11:27:38 +0200
From: Benjamin ZORES <benjamin.zores@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <48201296.50905@domain.hid>
	<2ff1a98a0805060213r771b1dfbya40a4836d77f9d97@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <2ff1a98a0805060213r771b1dfbya40a4836d77f9d97@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Timing Issues on x86_32 SMP
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>

Gilles Chanteperdrix a =E9crit :
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Benjamin ZORES
> <benjamin.zores@domain.hid> wrote:
>  =20
>
> Why not x86_64 ?
>
>  =20
Cause I don't need 64 bits.
>
> Have you run the latency test to know if you have no hardware issue ?
>
>  =20
Do you have a quick way to start this test ?

Regards,

Ben