From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@gmail.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: linux-next: WARNING: at kernel/panic.c:375 __stack_chk_test+0x50/0x54()
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 20:35:56 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4820EB5C.2010102@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4820EA7B.4050406@linux.intel.com>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Kevin Winchester wrote:
>> David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 12:49:33 -0700
>>>
>>>> this is weird; something is adding ANOTHER -fstack-protector to the
>>>> (effective) gcc
>>>> flags.. which might be overriding the -fstack-protector-all setting.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if this is a distro special ;(
>>> Ubuntu adds -fstack-protector to the GCC command line.
>>>
>>> But I've been able to override it trivially when, for example, doing
>>> GCC builds, by simply adding -fno-stack-protector.
>> I assume adding -fno-stack-protector would not really be an option in
>> this case (since if I understand correctly it would be appended to the
>> end of the flags which would turn the option off).
>>
>> I guess I'll be figuring out how to build my own gcc...
>
> one question (since I don't have an ubuntu system on my desk right now)
>
> if you do
>
> make V=1 kernel/panic.o
>
> (after deleting that file if needed), can you check that -fstack-protector-all is the last
> stack protector option we explicitly give to gcc ?
> (anything else is distro special which we unfortunately cannot fix.. but maybe we can detect)
>
>
kevin@alekhine:~/linux/linux-2.6$ make V=1 kernel/panic.o
rm -f include/config/kernel.release
echo 2.6.25-next-20080430 > include/config/kernel.release
set -e; :; mkdir -p include/linux/; (echo \#define
LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132633; echo '#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) <<
16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))';) < /home/kevin/linux/linux-2.6/Makefile >
include/linux/version.h.tmp; if [ -r include/linux/version.h ] && cmp -s
include/linux/version.h include/linux/version.h.tmp; then rm -f
include/linux/version.h.tmp; else :; mv -f include/linux/version.h.tmp
include/linux/version.h; fi
set -e; :; mkdir -p include/linux/; if [ `echo -n
"2.6.25-next-20080430" | wc -c ` -gt 64 ]; then echo
'"2.6.25-next-20080430" exceeds 64 characters' >&2; exit 1; fi; (echo
\#define UTS_RELEASE \"2.6.25-next-20080430\";) <
include/config/kernel.release > include/linux/utsrelease.h.tmp; if [ -r
include/linux/utsrelease.h ] && cmp -s include/linux/utsrelease.h
include/linux/utsrelease.h.tmp; then rm -f
include/linux/utsrelease.h.tmp; else :; mv -f
include/linux/utsrelease.h.tmp include/linux/utsrelease.h; fi
set -e; asmlink=`readlink include/asm | cut -d '-' -f 2`; \
if [ -L include/asm ]; then \
if [ "$asmlink" != "x86" ]; then \
echo "ERROR: the symlink include/asm points to
asm-$asmlink but asm-x86 was expected"; \
echo " set ARCH or save .config and run
'make mrproper' to fix it"; \
exit 1; \
fi; \
else \
echo ' SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86'; \
if [ ! -d include ]; then \
mkdir -p include; \
fi; \
ln -fsn asm-x86 include/asm; \
fi
mkdir -p .tmp_versions
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=.
mkdir -p kernel/
mkdir -p arch/x86/kernel/
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=. missing-syscalls
/bin/bash scripts/checksyscalls.sh gcc -Wp,-MD,./.missing-syscalls.d
-nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/include
-D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -include include/linux/autoconf.h -Wall -Wundef
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Os -fno-stack-protector -m64
-march=k8 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time
-maccumulate-outgoing-args -fstack-protector -DGCC_HAS_SP
-fstack-protector-all -pipe -Wno-sign-compare
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow
-Iinclude/asm-x86/mach-default -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-fno-optimize-sibling-calls -g -pg -Wdeclaration-after-statement
-Wno-pointer-sign -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s"
-D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(missing_syscalls)"
-D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(missing_syscalls)"
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/mod
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=kernel kernel/panic.o
gcc -Wp,-MD,kernel/.panic.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.3/include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude
-include include/linux/autoconf.h -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Os -fno-stack-protector -m64
-march=k8 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time
-maccumulate-outgoing-args -fstack-protector -DGCC_HAS_SP
-fstack-protector-all -pipe -Wno-sign-compare
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow
-Iinclude/asm-x86/mach-default -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-fno-optimize-sibling-calls -g -pg -Wdeclaration-after-statement
-Wno-pointer-sign -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s"
-D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(panic)"
-D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(panic)" -c -o kernel/panic.o kernel/panic.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-06 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-30 23:58 linux-next: WARNING: at kernel/panic.c:375 __stack_chk_test+0x50/0x54() Kevin Winchester
2008-05-01 0:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-01 0:24 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-04-30 7:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-01 22:37 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-05-01 11:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-03 23:22 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-05-06 19:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-06 20:34 ` David Miller
2008-05-06 23:09 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-05-06 23:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-06 23:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-06 23:35 ` Kevin Winchester [this message]
2008-05-06 23:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4820EB5C.2010102@gmail.com \
--to=kjwinchester@gmail.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.