From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 10:12:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48210FFC.4080403@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080506205852.8adaa0a2.pj@sgi.com>
Paul Jackson wrote:
> Paul M wrote:
>> I was just trying to get close to the original behaviour.
>
> An honorable goal.
>
> Li Zefan - would you be interested in generating a patch
> that fails -EINVAL for inputs outside the range of [-1 ... N]
> for whatever small positive N the kernel recognizes?
>
> This seems like a minor enough difference that I for one
> don't have any problem with the current code, remapping
> all negative inputs to -1, going in, and then a follow-on
> patch changing that going in afterward.
>
> Of course, if you or Seto-san prefer the current behaviour,
> it would be easy to persuade me to agree.
>
I prefer to put a limit on it, but as Andrew just said, we don't
need to rush for this. But sure I'll post a patch if Seto-san
doesn't have an objection on this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-07 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-07 1:08 [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file Paul Menage
2008-05-07 1:21 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-07 1:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:40 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 3:38 ` Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch (was: Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file) Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 3:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 3:52 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 6:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-08 17:56 ` Reverting per-cpuset "system" (IRQ affinity) patch Max Krasnyansky
2008-05-09 10:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 11:26 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-21 0:46 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-05-07 1:38 ` [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:41 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 9:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-07 15:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 1:46 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-07 1:49 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 1:51 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 1:58 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:08 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 2:11 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:15 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 2:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-07 2:32 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:12 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2008-05-07 2:17 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-07 2:27 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48210FFC.4080403@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.