All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francesco Dolcini <fdolcini@sysnetsistemi.it>
To: joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se
Cc: Bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] STP bug, loop not detetcted
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 11:04:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4822C20B.3050303@sysnetsistemi.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210233718.32216.121.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se>

Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 02:16 +0000, richardvoigt@gmail.com wrote:
>> If a bridge receives one of its own STP packets on the same interface
>> from which it was sent, that indicates a loop elsewhere in the network
>> that disabling an interface locally will not fix, therefore STP takes
>> no action.
> 
> I see, would it hurt something else if STP did turn off it interface in
> this case? Optical i/f's is getting more common so these types of loops
> will increase so I think this needs to be addressed.
> 
cisco and others solved this kind of problem using proprietary 
unidirectional link detection protocols (see cisco informational rfc 
5171 for example). No standard exists as far as I know (BFD rfc does not 
consider the layer 2 case).

I am working on an custom udld protocol implementation at the moment ...

> Any chance Rapid STP will fix my problem?
no

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-08  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-07  9:22 [Bridge] STP bug, loop not detetcted Joakim Tjernlund
2008-05-07  9:33 ` Jaime Nebrera
2008-05-07 10:40   ` Benny Amorsen
2008-05-07 10:42 ` Benny Amorsen
2008-05-08  2:16 ` richardvoigt
2008-05-08  8:01   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2008-05-08  9:04     ` Francesco Dolcini [this message]
2008-05-08 10:01       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2008-05-08 12:13         ` Francesco Dolcini
2008-05-08 12:58           ` Joakim Tjernlund
2008-05-12  9:37             ` Joakim Tjernlund
2008-05-12 17:50               ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-05-12 17:54                 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2008-05-13  3:10     ` richardvoigt
2008-05-13  7:35       ` Joakim Tjernlund
2008-05-13  8:41       ` Benny Amorsen
2008-05-13 22:29         ` Dylan Hall
2008-05-13 23:09           ` richardvoigt
2008-05-13 23:56             ` Dylan Hall
2008-05-14  0:55               ` Brad Dameron
2008-05-14  7:27           ` Francesco Dolcini
2008-05-13 17:28       ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-05-13 19:24         ` [Bridge] RSTP implementation choice Benoit PAPILLAULT
2008-05-14  7:51         ` [Bridge] STP bug, loop not detetcted Francesco Dolcini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4822C20B.3050303@sysnetsistemi.it \
    --to=fdolcini@sysnetsistemi.it \
    --cc=Bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.