From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <48241F2A.1010607@domain.hid>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 11:53:46 +0200
From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <48241735.1050400@domain.hid> <482419AC.1060706@domain.hid>
	<48241C40.1020503@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <48241C40.1020503@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Philippe Gerum <philippe.gerum@domain.hid>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] avoid deadlock-prone sighand_lock
	in	do_schedule_event
Reply-To: rpm@xenomai.org
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: Xenomai-core@domain.hid

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> This has been posted earlier already: Fix deadlocks when debugging
>>> Xenomai applications via gdb by removing any attempt to acquire
>>> sighand_lock (while holding rq_lock). This patch also cleans up the now
>>> unused lock wrapper.
>>>
>>> Unless someone complains, I'm going to merge this later today into trunk
>>> and 2.4.x.
>>>
>> It's already in.
> 
> Indeed, missed it. May I remove the wrapper?
>

Would be nice, yes.

-- 
Philippe.