All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: Mail List - Netfilter <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: DNAT routing problem
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 09:20:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48245DCB.6060905@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3598a5460805090630m2676a18dp9f25e7ca9efb9ca9@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/09/08 08:30, Andrea Ranieri wrote:
> My previous tests involved a ipv4 flow going always from 10.0.5.2 to 
> 10.0.6.2, and the results remains those I wrote in my first mail. Now 
> I tried to change the source IP, and finally, the natting process 
> begins. But obiviously with a strange behavior...

(See below.)

> In this test I always have the 10.0.5.2->10.0.6.2 flow running, and a 
> 10.0.5.[2 to 5]->10.0.6.2 flow. Every IP except the .2 get natted. 
> The .2 remains unchanged. Moreover, when i flush the nat table, the 
> rule disappear but .3, .4 and .5 IPs continue to get natted. I think 
> that's a cache problem.

This really makes me believe that you are dealing with what connection 
tracking thinks is an on going existing established flow / connection. 
Remember that the NAT table only sees the first packet of a connection. 
  So if you are altering your NAT table after a connection is 
established it will name make any difference to the existing connection. 
  This is further exemplified by you testing .3-.5 and seeing them start 
to change and then continue doing what they were when you flush your NAT 
table.  I think you will find that if you stop your connections, wait a 
few minutes, and then start them back up they will behave as expected.

> It's time to put feet in the mouth, isn't it? ^___^

Na.  ;)



Grant. . . .

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-09 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-08 18:17 DNAT routing problem Andrea Ranieri
2008-05-08 19:37 ` Grant Taylor
2008-05-09 10:48 ` Andrea Ranieri
2008-05-09 13:04   ` Cloves Pereira Costa Jr
2008-05-09 13:30   ` Andrea Ranieri
2008-05-09 14:20     ` Grant Taylor [this message]
2008-05-09 16:34     ` Andrea Ranieri
2008-05-09 17:55       ` Grant Taylor
2008-05-10  8:56       ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-12 16:40         ` Andrea Ranieri
2008-05-10  8:52   ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48245DCB.6060905@riverviewtech.net \
    --to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.