From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/10] Bsdacct: turn the acct_lock from on-the-struct to global
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 15:04:36 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482C18C4.5000900@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <482C15FE.7070300@openvz.org>
Don't use per-bsd-acct-struct lock, but work with a global one.
This lock is taken for short periods, so it doesn't seem it'll
become a bottleneck, but it will allow us to easily avoid many
locking difficulties in the future.
So this is a mostly s/acct_globals.lock/acct_lock/ over the file.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
---
kernel/acct.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/acct.c b/kernel/acct.c
index 05f8bc0..fc71c13 100644
--- a/kernel/acct.c
+++ b/kernel/acct.c
@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ static void do_acct_process(struct pid_namespace *ns, struct file *);
* the cache line to have the data after getting the lock.
*/
struct bsd_acct_struct {
- spinlock_t lock;
volatile int active;
volatile int needcheck;
struct file *file;
@@ -91,8 +90,9 @@ struct bsd_acct_struct {
struct timer_list timer;
};
-static struct bsd_acct_struct acct_globals __cacheline_aligned =
- {__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(acct_globals.lock)};
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(acct_lock);
+
+static struct bsd_acct_struct acct_globals __cacheline_aligned;
/*
* Called whenever the timer says to check the free space.
@@ -114,11 +114,11 @@ static int check_free_space(struct file *file)
sector_t resume;
sector_t suspend;
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
res = acct_globals.active;
if (!file || !acct_globals.needcheck)
goto out;
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
/* May block */
if (vfs_statfs(file->f_path.dentry, &sbuf))
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int check_free_space(struct file *file)
* If some joker switched acct_globals.file under us we'ld better be
* silent and _not_ touch anything.
*/
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
if (file != acct_globals.file) {
if (act)
res = act>0;
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int check_free_space(struct file *file)
add_timer(&acct_globals.timer);
res = acct_globals.active;
out:
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
return res;
}
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ out:
* Close the old accounting file (if currently open) and then replace
* it with file (if non-NULL).
*
- * NOTE: acct_globals.lock MUST be held on entry and exit.
+ * NOTE: acct_lock MUST be held on entry and exit.
*/
static void acct_file_reopen(struct file *file)
{
@@ -201,11 +201,11 @@ static void acct_file_reopen(struct file *file)
}
if (old_acct) {
mnt_unpin(old_acct->f_path.mnt);
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
do_acct_process(old_ns, old_acct);
filp_close(old_acct, NULL);
put_pid_ns(old_ns);
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
}
}
@@ -235,10 +235,10 @@ static int acct_on(char *name)
return error;
}
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
mnt_pin(file->f_path.mnt);
acct_file_reopen(file);
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
mntput(file->f_path.mnt); /* it's pinned, now give up active reference */
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_acct(const char __user *name)
} else {
error = security_acct(NULL);
if (!error) {
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
acct_file_reopen(NULL);
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
}
}
return error;
@@ -289,10 +289,10 @@ asmlinkage long sys_acct(const char __user *name)
*/
void acct_auto_close_mnt(struct vfsmount *m)
{
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
if (acct_globals.file && acct_globals.file->f_path.mnt == m)
acct_file_reopen(NULL);
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
}
/**
@@ -304,12 +304,12 @@ void acct_auto_close_mnt(struct vfsmount *m)
*/
void acct_auto_close(struct super_block *sb)
{
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
if (acct_globals.file &&
acct_globals.file->f_path.mnt->mnt_sb == sb) {
acct_file_reopen(NULL);
}
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
}
/*
@@ -594,15 +594,15 @@ void acct_process(void)
if (!acct_globals.file)
return;
- spin_lock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_lock(&acct_lock);
file = acct_globals.file;
if (unlikely(!file)) {
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
return;
}
get_file(file);
ns = get_pid_ns(acct_globals.ns);
- spin_unlock(&acct_globals.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&acct_lock);
do_acct_process(ns, file);
fput(file);
--
1.5.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-15 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-15 10:52 [PATCH 0/10] Make bsd process accounting work in pid namespaces Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/10] Bsdacct: rename acct_blbls to bsd_acct_struct Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/10] Pidns: use kzalloc when allocating new pid_namespace struct Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 10:58 ` [PATCH 3/10] Pidns: add the struct bsd_acct_struct pointer on " Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:00 ` [PATCH 4/10] Bsdacct: "truthify" a comment near acct_process Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:02 ` [PATCH 5/10] Bsdacct: make check timer accept a bsd_acct_struct argument Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:04 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2008-05-15 11:07 ` [PATCH 7/10] Bsdacct: make internal code work with passed bsd_acct_struct, not global Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:08 ` [PATCH 8/10] Bsdacct: switch from global bsd_acct_struct instance to per-pidns one Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:10 ` [PATCH 9/10] Bsdacct: turn acct off for all pidns-s on umount time Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-15 11:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] Bsdacct: account dying tasks in all relevant namespaces Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-16 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-16 10:11 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-05-16 10:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-16 2:43 ` [PATCH 0/10] Make bsd process accounting work in pid namespaces Andrew Morton
2008-05-16 10:16 ` Pavel Emelyanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482C18C4.5000900@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.