From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: netfilter moving to git Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 16:33:47 +0200 Message-ID: <482C49CB.8060306@trash.net> References: <48299680.7020808@trash.net> <4829A316.2080402@trash.net> <4829B177.9000501@trash.net> <482B1335.30200@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist , Netfilter Core Team To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:43437 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755231AbYEOOdt (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2008 10:33:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > There was confusion (in the git layer) how to handle the svn path > reordering that took place over time, which Yasuyuki did a great job > of clearing up. But making it a good git repository does not stop > after importing and, probably git-tagging the SVN branches^W tags^W > twigs. I mean hey, try to work with it like with the standards that > git and linux set, like > > $ git shortlog v1.4.0..HEAD -- > fatal: bad revision 'v1.4.0..HEAD' > > Oh shoot, the tags are not the usual ones. Well, deducting a point > and continuing the quest: > > $ git shortlog svn_t_iptables_1_4_0..HEAD -- > fatal: bad revision 'svn_t_iptables_1_4_0..HEAD' There is no 1.4.0 tag in SVN, so there's none in git. > $ git shortlog svn_t_iptables_1_4_0rc1..HEAD -- | grep -v '^ ' > /C=EU/ST=EU/CN=Pablo Neira Ayuso/... (4): > /C=EU/ST=EU/CN=Patrick McHardy/... (107): > /C=JP/ST=JP/CN=Yasuyuki Kozakai/... (29): > > Hm yeah X.509, not exactly git but.. *sigh*. Even so, the > contributors should get their share in the release shortlog which, > ignoring that moving to git was just recent, would also happen too > seldom if things continue their way in that 6 month cycle. Not sure what you're trying to say, what does the release cycle have to do with anything?