From: David Fix <davidf@mrxfx.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Hello and a question about high cpu usage on jfsCommit (kernel 2.6.25.1)
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 15:35:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482C9090.5040901@mrxfx.com> (raw)
Hey guys,
I'm new to the list, but I've been using Linux and fooling around with
the kernel for ages. :)
I've been experiencing high CPU usage for jfsCommit on kernel 2.6.25.1
(haven't had a chance to go to 2.6.25.4, but I didn't see any
JFS-specific changes between the versions yet). Here's my hardware
config, as well:
CPUs: 2x Intel Xeon E5420 2.5GHz Quad-core
RAM: 8GB
RAID Controller: 3Ware 9650SE-24M8
I can't find a mention of what motherboard I have in here, so I'll give
a bit of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 5000P Chipset Memory Controller
Hub (rev b1)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB/3100 Chipset
UHCI USB Controller #1 (rev 09)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev d9)
01:00.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6311ESB/6321ESB PCI Express
Upstream Port (rev 01)
03:00.0 PCI bridge: Integrated Device Technology, Inc. Unknown device
8018 (rev 04) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit Ethernet
Controller (rev 06)
07:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 80003ES2LAN Gigabit
Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01)
0c:00.0 RAID bus controller: 3ware Inc 9650SE SATA-II RAID (rev 01)
0f:0c.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc ES1000 (rev 02)
There's the salient points there. The NIC is a quad, which is trunked
to the switch using LAPC.
I've got a RAID-6 on the 3Ware controller of 20 TB, and when I'm running
"top", I see this:
---
top - 15:33:27 up 5:40, 3 users, load average: 4.33, 3.59, 3.98
Tasks: 315 total, 2 running, 313 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.2%us, 13.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 61.3%id, 24.9%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.2%si,
0.0%st
Mem: 8194264k total, 8144500k used, 49764k free, 3884k buffers
Swap: 16779884k total, 148k used, 16779736k free, 7667400k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2669 root 15 -5 0 0 0 R 99 0.0 19:45.71 jfsCommit
---
And people are complaining (and I'm seeing) very slow writes to the drives.
Just wondering if anyone has any ideas. :) If you need any
information, I'll provide whatever you need.
Thanks in advance!
Dave
next reply other threads:[~2008-05-15 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-15 19:35 David Fix [this message]
2008-05-15 20:15 ` Hello and a question about high cpu usage on jfsCommit (kernel 2.6.25.1) David Fix
2008-05-19 15:37 ` Dave Kleikamp
2008-05-20 12:19 ` [Jfs-discussion] " Christian Kujau
2008-05-20 13:06 ` David Fix
2008-05-20 14:10 ` Dave Kleikamp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482C9090.5040901@mrxfx.com \
--to=davidf@mrxfx.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.