From: "Stéphane ANCELOT" <sancelot@free.fr>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: detecting kernel mem leak
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:58:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482D4CC8.2050501@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805151036030.18708@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Tue, 13 May 2008, Stéphane ANCELOT wrote:
>
>
>> I kept my kernel running with few applications for 5 days , doing
>> nothing more than backing up few kb of data on disk and refresh few X apps.
>>
>> Ater five days the global memory available go down from 24Mb to 8Mb ...
>>
>
> That is normal. Linux tries to put all memory to use and will free on
> demand.
>
>
>> The are some signifiant changes in slabinfo but now, I do not know where
>> to search ?
>>
>
> Compile the slabinfo tool.
>
> gcc -o slabinfo linux/Documentation/vm/slabinfo.c
>
> Then you can do
>
> slabinfo -T
>
> to get an overview of how much is used by slabs. But I do not see that
> slabs are using an excessive amount. So toying around with slabinfo is
> not going to get you anywhere.
>
>
1) slabinfo tells me SYSFS support for SLUB not active
In the kernel, there is SLAB or SLUB , my kernel is at this time
configured for SLAB allocator.
it is documented SLUB minimizes cache line usage.
Do you think I have to switch to SLUB ?
2) regarding memory debugging, your reply and some mesages told it was
normal the memory was growing (with ext3 buffer_heads...) and released
on demand.
This sounds to me it becomes VERY VERY difficult telling if my system
is STABLE or NOT. Is there a way to bypass it ?
I assume I have to do some kind of small program trying to allocate
almost the full remaining memory available at startup to empty caches ?
Best Regards
Steph
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-16 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 9:41 detecting kernel mem leak sancelot
2008-04-29 12:46 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-29 16:58 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <4821C526.8030901@free.fr>
2008-05-07 17:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-13 8:50 ` Stéphane ANCELOT
2008-05-13 19:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-15 10:58 ` Stéphane ANCELOT
2008-05-15 17:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-16 8:58 ` Stéphane ANCELOT [this message]
2008-05-16 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-13 10:26 Tomasz Chmielewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482D4CC8.2050501@free.fr \
--to=sancelot@free.fr \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.