All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Ustyuzhaninov <alust@alust.homeunix.com>
To: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 09:53:37 +0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <482E56C1.2070508@alust.homeunix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <482DA25D.70703@plouf.fr.eu.org>

Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Alexei Ustyuzhaninov a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I have a weird with the same scenario: after rerouting a packet goes
>>>> out through another interface but keeps the source address of the 
>>>> original interface.
>>>
>>> Yes that is ... how the code is currently written it seems.
> 
> The source address is chosen before the packet is sent to the OUTPUT 
> chains, and cannot be changed by the rerouting code, this would break 
> things such as connection tracking. It requires stateful NAT so the 
> correct original address is put back in replies. By the way, DNAT in the 
> OUTPUT chain used to implicitly change the source address when the new 
> destination address caused the output interface to change until kernel 
> 2.6.11.

Hm. That's not clear to me as I don't know the destination address in 
advance (and don't want to change it). Anyhow this solution is obsolete 
as I see.

>> Well, maybe you can suggest how to work around this? :) I tried snat, 
>> but this solution seems not to work.
> 
> SNAT should work on packets creating a new connection (i.e. in the state 
> NEW).

Yes, really! The SYN packet goes out through the right interface with 
the right source address, SYN/ACK comes back and that's all, nothing 
will happen more.

Anyhow  isn't this problem unresolvable in general? I just want a simple 
thing: to send mail via one provider and all other traffic via the other 
provider,

-- 
Thanks,
Alexei

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-17  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-07 14:36 fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question pthyseba
2008-05-07 15:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-11 16:23   ` Alexei Ustyuzhaninov
2008-05-11 17:39     ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-11 17:50       ` Alexei Ustyuzhaninov
2008-05-16 15:03         ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-05-17  3:53           ` Alexei Ustyuzhaninov [this message]
2008-05-17 10:49             ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-05-17 12:37               ` Alexei Ustyuzhaninov
2008-05-17 23:26                 ` Pascal Hambourg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=482E56C1.2070508@alust.homeunix.com \
    --to=alust@alust.homeunix.com \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.