From: Bernie Innocenti <bernie@codewiz.org>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
ext3-users@redhat.com, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Stefano Fedrigo <aleph@develer.com>
Subject: ext3_dx_add_entry: Directory index full!
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 17:36:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48304CE2.1090808@codewiz.org> (raw)
On 2.6.24.4-64.fc8, I createed and mounted a filesystem like this:
mke2fs -m0 -b 1024 -R stride=64 -I 128 -i 2048 -j -L mail -O dir_index,sparse_super -v /dev/sdc1
mount -t ext3 -o noatime,data=writeback,nosuid,usrquota /dev/sdc1 /mail
Then I copied a directory with 200K small files into it:
cp -a home/simone/Maildir/YouHaveJunkSir /mail/
[...]
cp: cannot create regular file `/mnt/YouHaveJunkSir/1174170042.20731_2.trinity.develer.com:2,b': No space left on device
cp: cannot create regular file `/mnt/YouHaveJunkSir/1186341042.8337_2.trinity.develer.com:2,': No space left on device
cp: cannot create regular file `/mnt/YouHaveJunkSir/1209101786.3888_2.trinity.develer.com:2,': No space left on device
The kernel logs are also scary:
EXT3-fs warning (device sdc1): ext3_dx_add_entry: Directory index full!
EXT3-fs warning (device sdc1): ext3_dx_add_entry: Directory index full!
[...]
The failing check looks like this:
if (levels && (dx_get_count(frames->entries) ==
dx_get_limit(frames->entries))) {
ext3_warning(sb, __FUNCTION__,
"Directory index full!");
err = -ENOSPC;
goto cleanup;
}
The limit is set in make_indexed_dir():
dx_set_limit (entries, dx_root_limit(dir, sizeof(root->info)));
with this helper function:
static inline unsigned dx_root_limit (struct inode *dir, unsigned infosize)
{
unsigned entry_space = dir->i_sb->s_blocksize - EXT3_DIR_REC_LEN(1) -
EXT3_DIR_REC_LEN(2) - infosize;
return 0? 20: entry_space / sizeof(struct dx_entry);
}
Am I reading the above code correctly? Why does it always return
20 no matter what?
Some background: I'm moving users' Maildirs to a separate filesystem tuned
for small files to increase performance. One of our users intentionally
collected spam for 5 years in one folder and likes it this way.
We could easily work it around, but first I'd like to understand whether
the particular parameters we used trigger a bug in ext3 or if we're just
hitting a (possibly undocumented) limit.
--
\___/
_| X | Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\|_O_| "It's an education project, not a laptop project!"
next reply other threads:[~2008-05-18 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-18 15:36 Bernie Innocenti [this message]
2008-05-18 15:38 ` ext3_dx_add_entry: Directory index full! Bernie Innocenti
2008-05-18 18:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-05-18 21:04 ` Theodore Tso
2008-05-19 0:58 ` Bernie Innocenti
2008-05-18 15:39 ` David Woodhouse
2008-05-18 15:44 ` Bernie Innocenti
2008-05-18 16:24 ` Theodore Tso
2008-05-18 23:01 ` Stefano Fedrigo
2008-05-19 0:49 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48304CE2.1090808@codewiz.org \
--to=bernie@codewiz.org \
--cc=aleph@develer.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ext3-users@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.