From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aviro@redhat.com,
drepper@redhat.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] correct flags to f_mode conversion in __dentry_open
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 19:54:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <483461DA.3060304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080317104537.GA32546@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 05:59:52PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> does 11 really mean and should it really always be mapped to (FMODE_READ
>>> | FMODE_WRITE) or should it continue to get mapped to 'no permission?'
>> We've always mapped 3 to "no permission" to read or write. It's a linuxism
>
> I've tripped over this recently aswell. It would for sure be useful
> to add a sumbolic O_FOO constant for this magic value '3' and document
> it in the manpage.
Late follow-up to this thread
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/653123):
I propose to add the following text to the open(2) man page.
Unlike the other values that can be specified in flags,
the access mode values O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY, and O_RDWR, do
not specify individual bits. Rather, they define the low
order two bits of flags, and are defined respectively as
0, 1, and 2. In other words, the combination O_RDONLY |
O_WRONLY is a logical error, and certainly does not have
the same meaning as O_RDWR. Linux reserves the special,
non-standard access mode 3 (binary 11) in flags to mean:
check for read and write permission on the file and
return a descriptor that can't be used for reading or
writing. This non-standard access mode is used by some
Linux drivers to return a descriptor that is only to be
used for device-specific ioctl(2) operations.
Seem okay?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-21 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 18:25 [RFC] correct flags to f_mode conversion in __dentry_open Eric Paris
2008-03-12 18:34 ` Al Viro
2008-03-12 18:41 ` Eric Paris
2008-03-12 18:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-03-15 21:59 ` Alan Cox
2008-03-15 22:00 ` Alexander Viro
2008-03-17 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-21 17:54 ` Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2008-05-22 2:10 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=483461DA.3060304@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages@googlemail.com \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.