All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aviro@redhat.com,
	drepper@redhat.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] correct flags to f_mode conversion in __dentry_open
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 19:54:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <483461DA.3060304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080317104537.GA32546@infradead.org>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 05:59:52PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> does 11 really mean and should it really always be mapped to (FMODE_READ
>>> | FMODE_WRITE) or should it continue to get mapped to 'no permission?'
>> We've always mapped 3 to "no permission" to read or write. It's a linuxism
> 
> I've tripped over this recently aswell.  It would for sure be useful
> to add a sumbolic O_FOO constant for this magic value '3' and document
> it in the manpage.

Late follow-up to this thread
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/653123):
I propose to add the following text to the open(2) man page.

       Unlike the other values that can be specified  in  flags,
       the access mode values O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY, and O_RDWR, do
       not specify individual bits.  Rather, they define the low
       order  two bits of flags, and are defined respectively as
       0, 1, and 2.  In other words, the combination O_RDONLY  |
       O_WRONLY  is a logical error, and certainly does not have
       the same meaning as O_RDWR.  Linux reserves the  special,
       non-standard  access mode 3 (binary 11) in flags to mean:
       check for read and  write  permission  on  the  file  and
       return  a  descriptor  that  can't be used for reading or
       writing.  This non-standard access mode is used  by  some
       Linux  drivers  to return a descriptor that is only to be
       used for device-specific ioctl(2) operations.

Seem okay?

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html


  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-21 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-12 18:25 [RFC] correct flags to f_mode conversion in __dentry_open Eric Paris
2008-03-12 18:34 ` Al Viro
2008-03-12 18:41   ` Eric Paris
2008-03-12 18:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-03-15 21:59 ` Alan Cox
2008-03-15 22:00   ` Alexander Viro
2008-03-17 10:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-21 17:54     ` Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2008-05-22  2:10       ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=483461DA.3060304@gmail.com \
    --to=mtk.manpages@googlemail.com \
    --cc=alan@redhat.com \
    --cc=aviro@redhat.com \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.