From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "Li, Tong N" <tong.n.li@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
mingo@elte.hu, pj@sgi.com
Subject: Re: fair group scheduler not so fair?
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 18:17:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48360D21.9060102@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1211490819.6463.172.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Given the following:
>
> root
> / | \
> _A_ 1 2
> /| |\
> 3 4 5 B
> / \
> 6 7
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> root root
> / \ / \
> A 1 A 2
> / \ / \
> 4 B 3 5
> / \
> 6 7
How do you move specific groups to different cpus. Is this simply using
cpusets?
>
> Numerical examples given the above scenario, assuming every body's
> weight is 1024:
> s_(0,A) = s_(1,A) = 512
Just to make sure I understand what's going on...this is half of 1024
because it shows up on both cpus?
> s_(0,B) = 1024, s_(1,B) = 0
This gets the full 1024 because it's only on one cpu.
> rw_(0,A) = rw(1,A) = 2048
> rw_(0,B) = 2048, rw_(1,B) = 0
How do we get 2048? Shouldn't this be 1024?
> h_load_(0,A) = h_load_(1,A) = 512
> h_load_(0,B) = 256, h_load(1,B) = 0
At this point the numbers make sense, but I'm not sure how the formula
for h_load_ works given that I'm not sure what's going on for rw_.
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-23 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-21 23:59 fair group scheduler not so fair? Chris Friesen
2008-05-22 6:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-22 20:02 ` Chris Friesen
2008-05-22 20:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-22 20:18 ` Li, Tong N
2008-05-22 21:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-23 0:17 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2008-05-23 7:44 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-23 9:42 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-23 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-23 10:19 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-23 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-27 17:15 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-27 18:13 ` Chris Friesen
2008-05-28 16:33 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-28 18:35 ` Chris Friesen
2008-05-28 18:47 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-29 2:50 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-29 16:46 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-29 16:47 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-29 21:30 ` Chris Friesen
2008-05-30 6:43 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-05-30 10:21 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-05-30 11:36 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-06-02 20:03 ` Chris Friesen
2008-05-27 17:28 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48360D21.9060102@nortel.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=tong.n.li@intel.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.