From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JzNIG-0007lw-US for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 22:46:08 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JzNIE-0007lX-QN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 22:46:08 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60915 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JzNIE-0007lU-KL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 22:46:06 -0400 Received: from smtp113.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.84.66]:39284) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JzNIE-0004pd-Ec for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 22:46:06 -0400 Message-ID: <48363005.6040806@yahoo.com.br> Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 23:46:29 -0300 From: Tiago Maluta MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] question about -M and -cpu Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I've got qemu sources from svn and compiled for target arm. When I run qemu-arm I saw some differences in program options, such as, missing a -M option. I remember, in qemu maillist, a patch for adding CPU selection: http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=4399 I know that -cpu I got the same resolution that -M could be, but is there a formal reason for that? Best regards, - tiago