From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Modular command line options
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 17:12:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4836DED7.6090706@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80805230629u301fcc1cu7bdaeb25bc4dfb67@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2671 bytes --]
Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote:
>> Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Jan Kiszka writes ("[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Modular command line options"):
>>>> Following up on my earlier proposal to introduce per-machine command
>>>> line options, this version provides a more generic approach. It should
>>>> also be usable for scenarios like per-arch or per-accelerator.
>>> I approve of splitting the code up like this, and having a
>>> table-driven parsing arrangement. But ideally we could get rid of
>>> `index' and the giant switch() statements too. Something more like
>>>
>>> typedef void QEMUOptionParser(struct QEMUOption *option, const char *optarg);
>>>
>>> typedef struct QEMUOption {
>>> const char *name, *helpstring;
>>> QEMUOptionParser handler;
>>> int flags;
>> Ack. This just enforces a bit more effort to convert the existing
>> opts... :->
>>
>>> int int_for_handler;
>>> void *void_for_handler;
>> I don't think there is an need for both. A plain
>>
>> void *parser_opaque;
>>
>> should suffice as the user can perfectly typecast the void to int.
>>
>>> } QEMUOption;
>>>
>>> qemu_register_option_set(const QEMUOption *options);
>> Here I would then suggest
>>
>> qemu_register_option_set(const char *set_name,
>> const QEMUOption *options);
>>
>> to save the chance for visually grouping options.
>
> I don't follow the need for the set_name parameter. This should be in
> the OptionSet structure.
> You mean, joining two groups if they are registered with the same
> name? This can be done by enforcing them to have
> the same "name" parameter in the OptionSet structure. Am I failing to
> understand anything here?
Let's consider this hypothetical scenario:
$ qemu -h
...
Options specific to KQEMU accelerator:
-kernel-kqemu enable KQEMU full virtualization (default is user mode only)
-no-kqemu disable KQEMU kernel module usage
...
The registration will work like this:
QEMUOption kqemu_options[] = {
{ "kernel-kqemu", "enable KQEMU...", kqemu_enable_kernel, 0, NULL },
{ "no-kqemu", "disable KQEMU...", kqemu_disable, 0, NULL },
{ NULL }
};
...
cpu_get_phys_page_debug("KQEMU accelerator", kqemu_options);
The set name is then kept in the _private_ QEMUOptionSet structure that
is created and hooked into the global list by cpu_get_phys_page_debug.
Joining groups with identical names, at least for the help output, was
not planned yet. Might be a useful extension, but I would wait for
feedback on use cases first.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-23 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-20 23:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Modular command line options Jan Kiszka
2008-05-21 19:17 ` Glauber Costa
2008-05-21 20:58 ` Fabrice Bellard
2008-05-22 10:11 ` Ian Jackson
2008-05-22 10:19 ` Ian Jackson
2008-05-22 10:20 ` Ian Jackson
2008-05-22 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-05-23 13:29 ` Glauber Costa
2008-05-23 15:12 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4836DED7.6090706@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.