From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabian Hugelshofer Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] accounting on ct kill Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:36:05 +0100 Message-ID: <483D1975.3000601@gmx.ch> References: <1211447601.6878.38.camel@pumper.lan.luxnet.ch> <1211826305.19222.8.camel@pumper.lan.luxnet.ch> <483B93C2.1000905@trash.net> <483C1B9D.5060705@gmx.ch> <483C1F54.6040505@trash.net> <1211928920.14366.12.camel@pumper.lan.luxnet.ch> <483CDA82.8090802@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:37528 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751086AbYE1IgJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2008 04:36:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <483CDA82.8090802@trash.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Patrick McHardy wrote: > Fabian Hugelshofer wrote: >> Introduces nf_ct_kill_acct() which increments the accounting counters on >> conntrack kill. The new function was necessary, because there are calls >> to nf_ct_kill() which don't need accounting: [...] > Good points. Applied, thanks Fabian. > > I've also pulled in Dave's latest net-next-2.6.git tree and will > push it out now. Thank you as well, Patrick. What about my patch 1 (status field on ct destroy event)? I didn't see it in you git repository. Should I repost it with a signed-of-by?