From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: "David S. Ahern" <daahern@cisco.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] performance with guests running 2.4 kernels (specifically RHEL3)
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:51:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <483D391F.7050007@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4835EEF5.9010600@cisco.com>
David S. Ahern wrote:
> The short answer is that I am still see large system time hiccups in the
> guests due to kscand in the guest scanning its active lists. I do see
> better response for a KVM_MAX_PTE_HISTORY of 3 than with 4. (For
> completeness I also tried a history of 2, but it performed worse than 3
> which is no surprise given the meaning of it.)
>
>
> I have been able to scratch out a simplistic program that stimulates
> kscand activity similar to what is going on in my real guest (see
> attached). The program requests a memory allocation, initializes it (to
> get it backed) and then in a loop sweeps through the memory in chunks
> similar to a program using parts of its memory here and there but
> eventually accessing all of it.
>
> Start the RHEL3/CentOS 3 guest with *2GB* of RAM (or more). The key is
> using a fair amount of highmem. Start a couple of instances of the
> attached. For example, I've been using these 2:
>
> memuser 768M 120 5 300
> memuser 384M 300 10 600
>
> Together these instances take up a 1GB of RAM and once initialized
> consume very little CPU. On kvm they make kscand and kswapd go nuts
> every 5-15 minutes. For comparison, I do not see the same behavior for
> an identical setup running on esx 3.5.
>
I haven't been able to reproduce this:
> [root@localhost root]# ps -elf | grep -E 'memuser|kscand'
> 1 S root 7 1 1 75 0 - 0 schedu 10:07 ?
> 00:00:26 [kscand]
> 0 S root 1464 1 1 75 0 - 196986 schedu 10:20 pts/0
> 00:00:21 ./memuser 768M 120 5 300
> 0 S root 1465 1 0 75 0 - 98683 schedu 10:20 pts/0
> 00:00:10 ./memuser 384M 300 10 600
> 0 S root 2148 1293 0 75 0 - 922 pipe_w 10:48 pts/0
> 00:00:00 grep -E memuser|kscand
The workload has been running for about half an hour, and kswapd cpu
usage doesn't seem significant. This is a 2GB guest running with my
patch ported to kvm.git HEAD. Guest is has 2G of memory.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-28 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-16 0:15 performance with guests running 2.4 kernels (specifically RHEL3) David S. Ahern
2008-04-16 8:46 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-17 21:12 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-18 7:57 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-21 4:31 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-21 9:19 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-21 17:07 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-22 20:23 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-23 8:04 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-23 15:23 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-23 15:53 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-23 16:39 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-24 17:25 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-26 6:43 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-26 6:20 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-25 17:33 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-26 6:45 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-28 18:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-04-28 23:45 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-30 4:18 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-30 9:55 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-30 13:39 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-30 13:49 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-11 12:32 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-11 13:36 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-13 3:49 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-13 7:25 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-14 20:35 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-15 10:53 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-17 4:31 ` David S. Ahern
[not found] ` <482FCEE1.5040306@qumranet.com>
[not found] ` <4830F90A.1020809@cisco.com>
2008-05-19 4:14 ` [kvm-devel] " David S. Ahern
2008-05-19 14:27 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-19 16:25 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-19 17:04 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-20 14:19 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-20 14:34 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 22:08 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-28 10:51 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-05-28 14:13 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-28 14:35 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-28 19:49 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-29 6:37 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-28 14:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-05-28 14:57 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-28 15:39 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-29 11:49 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-29 12:10 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-29 13:49 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-29 14:08 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-28 15:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-05-28 15:37 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-28 15:43 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-28 17:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-05-28 17:24 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-29 10:01 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-29 14:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-05-29 15:11 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-29 15:16 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-30 13:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-05-31 7:39 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-29 16:42 ` David S. Ahern
2008-05-31 8:16 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-02 16:42 ` David S. Ahern
2008-06-05 8:37 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-05 16:20 ` David S. Ahern
2008-06-06 16:40 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-19 4:20 ` David S. Ahern
2008-06-22 6:34 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-23 14:09 ` David S. Ahern
2008-06-25 9:51 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-30 13:56 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2008-04-30 14:23 ` David S. Ahern
2008-04-23 8:03 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=483D391F.7050007@qumranet.com \
--to=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=daahern@cisco.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.