From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Give cpusets exclusive control over sched domains (ie remove cpu_isolated_map)
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 21:24:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <483F8178.7040300@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080529191211.080ec5cf.pj@sgi.com>
Paul Jackson wrote:
> Max wrote:
>> btw I suppose you missed my reply.
>
> I did not see your reply. Did you send it to me or lkml?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121207910616332&w=2
>> Also Ingo at some point accepted a patch from Peter
>> that partially removed the isolated map.
>
> Reference? Did it remove the boot parameter isolcpus= ?
Yes it removed boot param. I cannot seem to come up with the right search
string. And the sched-devel git tree is gone.
> My concern is removing user visible features, without
> good reason and careful consideration and some planning.
I understand. How would you plan for this ?
----
Did you get a chance to look at patch that addresses hotplug/domain issues ?
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-30 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-29 18:17 [PATCH] sched: CPU hotplug events must not destroy scheduler domains created by the cpusets Max Krasnyansky
2008-05-29 18:17 ` [PATCH] sched: Move cpu masks from kernel/sched.c into kernel/cpu.c Max Krasnyansky
2008-05-29 18:17 ` [PATCH] sched: Give cpusets exclusive control over sched domains (ie remove cpu_isolated_map) Max Krasnyansky
2008-05-29 22:37 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-29 22:59 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-05-30 0:12 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-30 4:24 ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
2008-05-30 6:52 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-31 19:12 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-01 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-02 2:39 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-02 2:35 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 0:49 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-29 23:26 ` [PATCH] sched: Move cpu masks from kernel/sched.c into kernel/cpu.c Paul Jackson
2008-05-30 4:08 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-05-30 4:10 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-02 15:19 ` [PATCH] sched: CPU hotplug events must not destroy scheduler domains created by the cpusets Paul Jackson
2008-06-02 17:55 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-02 19:01 ` Max Krasnyansky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-27 22:06 [PATCH] [sched] Move cpu masks from kernel/sched.c into kernel/cpu.c Max Krasnyansky
2008-05-27 22:06 ` [PATCH] [sched] Fixed CPU hotplug and sched domain handling Max Krasnyansky
2008-05-27 22:06 ` [PATCH] [sched] Give cpusets exclusive control over sched domains (ie remove cpu_isolated_map) Max Krasnyansky
2008-05-29 5:30 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-29 16:36 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=483F8178.7040300@qualcomm.com \
--to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.