All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frantisek Hanzlik <franta@hanzlici.cz>
To: Eddy Setyawan <eddymilis@teguhabadi.com>
Cc: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dosemu Slower than CMD
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 10:15:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48410933.4020101@hanzlici.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34cfb2e90805300203t1f904938q60405bbbe3e035a2@mail.gmail.com>

I just haven't no win machine, then I can't compare program response under
them.
However You can compile dosemu with log timestamping (see conditional
compilation  and SHOW_TIME and DBG_TIME identifiers in module
"src/base/misc/utilities.c") and try find Your application/dosemu code
bottleneck.

IMHO when Your app do any sort of intensive DOS/BIOS calls, then differences
between DOS/win and dosemu speed may be noticeable and scale 1:3 - 1:5
may be "normal", as their appropriate environments are different.

You may also tried Your app under clear FreeDOS or other DOS environment.

Franta Hanzlik

Eddy Setyawan wrote:
> Times for load this section is more faster when i run it on windows using CMD
> any idea to tweak dosemu to make this section faster like CMD does
> 
> quote "Note I must set DOS date to March 2008."
>   i think so because this app have closing month mechanism
> 
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik<franta@hanzlici.cz>  wrote:
>> Yes, I tried this section. Times are from pres Enter key at
>> "Ubah Harga Jual" to obtain some data - these appear as:
>>
>>   Browse  Search  Edit  Add  Del  Print  Restrukturisasi
>>   Melihat data-data dalam bentuk daftar
>> ¨UA                             CV. MITRA BANGUNAN
>>   20/03/2008¨U
>> ©°©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤ GROUP/ SUB GROUP
>> ©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©´
>> ©¦      Kode Group : 00001
>>     ©¦
>> ©¦            Nama : PT NIPSEA PAINT
>>     ©¦
>> ©¦ Kd. Group Induk :           (                                     )
>>     ©¦
>> ©¦     Jenis Group : F ( Induk )            Level :  1
>>     ©¦
>> ©¦     Harga Sales :          0        Ubah Harga : 2 Tidak
>>    ©¦
>> ©¦      Harga Toko :          0
>>    ©¦
>> ©¦  Terakhir Ganti :                         Oleh :
>>    ©¦
>> ©¦©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©Ð©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©Ð©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©Ð©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¦
>> ©¦Kode Barang    ©¦ Nama Barang                            ©¦ H. Sales ©¦ H.
>> Toko  ©¦
>> ©¦1000001        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG BS9102SS WHITE     ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000002        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 680 COTTON WHITE   ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000003        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG BS9102 WHITE       ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000004        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 900 EXTRA WHITE    ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000005        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 660SB BRILLIANT WHI©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000006        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 600 DIVINITY       ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000007        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 604 SPANISH WHITE  ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000008        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 603 SUSU           ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000009        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 607 BROKEN WHITE   ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¦1000010        ©¦KIMEX CAT TEMBOK 5KG 616 CREAM          ©¦         0©¦
>>    0©¦
>> ©¸©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¤©¼
>>   Esc¨BQuit  ¡û¡ú,Enter¨BMenu  Home¨BFirst  PgUp¨BPrev  PgDn¨BNext  End¨BLast
>>
>> CPU load I not measure, but as I said, 100% load may be OK.
>>
>> Note I must set DOS date to March 2008.
>>
>> Franta
>>
>> Eddy Setyawan wrote:
>>> hello Frantistek,
>>> Which segment you try ? I mean slow is at menu Master ->   Persediaan ->
>>> Ubah Harga Jual, while entering this section application cpu usage
>>> jump to 100% and waiting to load all data is takes time than CMD
>>> does... even at windows i try it with shared drive
>>>
>>> some alert dialog also eat CPU but after search around i found that
>>> clipper function for alert dialog has some bug
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik<franta@hanzlici.cz>
>>>   wrote:
>>>> As I wrote in my previous mail, in tested program segment is about
>>>> 200000 times called INT0x16 Fn 0x11 : Check_Enhanced_Keystroke.
>>>> In corresponding dosemu routines in "base/bios/int16.c" are called
>>>> some delay functions - maybe these may add some delay to program
>>>> execution.
>>>> On my system CLK_TCK=100 (ticks/sec), thus JIFFIE_TIME=10000 and
>>>> INT2F_IDLE_USECS=80000 (=>   80msec delay).
>>>> But as I wrote, on my faster PC exec time was 3 sec, thus delay
>>>> added in INT16 can't be longer.
>>>>
>>>> Bart Oldeman probably can say more about this.
>>>>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-31  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-15 16:47 Dosemu Slower than CMD Eddy Setyawan
2008-03-15 19:54 ` Reinhard Karcher
2008-03-16  2:22   ` Eddy Setyawan
2008-03-16  7:23     ` Rafał Cygnarowski
2008-03-16 10:41 ` Frantisek Hanzlik
2008-03-16 13:35   ` Eddy Setyawan
2008-03-16 13:43     ` Eddy Setyawan
2008-04-01 18:33     ` Mike McCarty
2008-05-29 17:19   ` Eddy Setyawan
2008-05-30  3:53     ` Frantisek Hanzlik
2008-05-30  8:27     ` Frantisek Hanzlik
2008-05-30  8:40       ` Eddy Setyawan
2008-05-30  8:56         ` Frantisek Hanzlik
     [not found]           ` <34cfb2e90805300203t1f904938q60405bbbe3e035a2@mail.gmail.com>
2008-05-31  8:15             ` Frantisek Hanzlik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48410933.4020101@hanzlici.cz \
    --to=franta@hanzlici.cz \
    --cc=eddymilis@teguhabadi.com \
    --cc=linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.