From: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
To: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix several spelling bugs
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:30:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4842EAA9.1070706@mail.berlios.de> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 215 bytes --]
This patch fixes several spelling bugs:
explicitely -> explicitly
stabalized -> stabilized
priveledged -> privileged
privledge,priledge -> privilege
shoud -> should
Please apply it to Qemu trunk.
Regards
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: spelling.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 7934 bytes --]
Index: linux-user/qemu.h
===================================================================
--- linux-user/qemu.h (revision 4638)
+++ linux-user/qemu.h (working copy)
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@
}
/* Unlock an area of guest memory. The first LEN bytes must be
- flushed back to guest memory. host_ptr = NULL is explicitely
+ flushed back to guest memory. host_ptr = NULL is explicitly
allowed and does nothing. */
static inline void unlock_user(void *host_ptr, abi_ulong guest_addr,
long len)
Index: linux-user/path.c
===================================================================
--- linux-user/path.c (revision 4638)
+++ linux-user/path.c (working copy)
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
return root;
}
-/* This needs to be done after tree is stabalized (ie. no more reallocs!). */
+/* This needs to be done after tree is stabilized (ie. no more reallocs!). */
static void set_parents(struct pathelem *child, struct pathelem *parent)
{
unsigned int i;
Index: target-ppc/translate.c
===================================================================
--- target-ppc/translate.c (revision 4638)
+++ target-ppc/translate.c (working copy)
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@
typedef struct opcode_t {
unsigned char opc1, opc2, opc3;
-#if HOST_LONG_BITS == 64 /* Explicitely align to 64 bits */
+#if HOST_LONG_BITS == 64 /* Explicitly align to 64 bits */
unsigned char pad[5];
#else
unsigned char pad[1];
Index: qemu-tech.texi
===================================================================
--- qemu-tech.texi (revision 4638)
+++ qemu-tech.texi (working copy)
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@
qemu-fast system emulator. It requires a patched Linux kernel to work
(you cannot launch the same kernel on your PC), but the patches are
really small. As it is a PC virtualizer (no emulation is done except
-for some priveledged instructions), it has the potential of being
+for some privileged instructions), it has the potential of being
faster than QEMU. The downside is that a complicated (and potentially
unsafe) host kernel patch is needed.
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@
result (called @code{CC_DST}) and the type of operation (called
@code{CC_OP}).
-@code{CC_OP} is almost never explicitely set in the generated code
+@code{CC_OP} is almost never explicitly set in the generated code
because it is known at translation time.
In order to increase performances, a backward pass is performed on the
Index: exec-all.h
===================================================================
--- exec-all.h (revision 4638)
+++ exec-all.h (working copy)
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@
{
/* patch the branch destination */
*(uint32_t *)jmp_addr = addr - (jmp_addr + 4);
- /* no need to flush icache explicitely */
+ /* no need to flush icache explicitly */
}
#elif defined(__arm__)
static inline void tb_set_jmp_target1(unsigned long jmp_addr, unsigned long addr)
Index: target-i386/cpu.h
===================================================================
--- target-i386/cpu.h (revision 4638)
+++ target-i386/cpu.h (working copy)
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@
enum {
CC_OP_DYNAMIC, /* must use dynamic code to get cc_op */
- CC_OP_EFLAGS, /* all cc are explicitely computed, CC_SRC = flags */
+ CC_OP_EFLAGS, /* all cc are explicitly computed, CC_SRC = flags */
CC_OP_MULB, /* modify all flags, C, O = (CC_SRC != 0) */
CC_OP_MULW,
Index: hw/integratorcp.c
===================================================================
--- hw/integratorcp.c (revision 4638)
+++ hw/integratorcp.c (working copy)
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@
}
ram_offset = qemu_ram_alloc(ram_size);
/* ??? On a real system the first 1Mb is mapped as SSRAM or boot flash. */
- /* ??? RAM shoud repeat to fill physical memory space. */
+ /* ??? RAM should repeat to fill physical memory space. */
/* SDRAM at address zero*/
cpu_register_physical_memory(0, ram_size, ram_offset | IO_MEM_RAM);
/* And again at address 0x80000000 */
Index: hw/versatilepb.c
===================================================================
--- hw/versatilepb.c (revision 4638)
+++ hw/versatilepb.c (working copy)
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
fprintf(stderr, "Unable to find CPU definition\n");
exit(1);
}
- /* ??? RAM shoud repeat to fill physical memory space. */
+ /* ??? RAM should repeat to fill physical memory space. */
/* SDRAM at address zero. */
cpu_register_physical_memory(0, ram_size, IO_MEM_RAM);
Index: hw/scsi-disk.c
===================================================================
--- hw/scsi-disk.c (revision 4638)
+++ hw/scsi-disk.c (working copy)
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@
case 0x46:
DPRINTF("Get Configuration (rt %d, maxlen %d)\n", buf[1] & 3, len);
memset(outbuf, 0, 8);
- /* ??? This shoud probably return much more information. For now
+ /* ??? This should probably return much more information. For now
just return the basic header indicating the CD-ROM profile. */
outbuf[7] = 8; // CD-ROM
r->buf_len = 8;
Index: hw/realview.c
===================================================================
--- hw/realview.c (revision 4638)
+++ hw/realview.c (working copy)
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
}
}
- /* ??? RAM shoud repeat to fill physical memory space. */
+ /* ??? RAM should repeat to fill physical memory space. */
/* SDRAM at address zero. */
cpu_register_physical_memory(0, ram_size, IO_MEM_RAM);
Index: hw/alpha_palcode.c
===================================================================
--- hw/alpha_palcode.c (revision 4638)
+++ hw/alpha_palcode.c (working copy)
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
};
#if 0
-/* One must explicitely check that the TB is valid and the FOE bit is reset */
+/* One must explicitly check that the TB is valid and the FOE bit is reset */
static void update_itb (void)
{
/* This writes into a temp register, not the actual one */
Index: tcg/tcg.c
===================================================================
--- tcg/tcg.c (revision 4638)
+++ tcg/tcg.c (working copy)
@@ -1406,7 +1406,7 @@
propagation */
tcg_out_movi(s, ots->type, ots->reg, val);
} else {
- /* The movi is not explicitely generated here */
+ /* The movi is not explicitly generated here */
if (ots->val_type == TEMP_VAL_REG)
s->reg_to_temp[ots->reg] = -1;
ots->val_type = TEMP_VAL_CONST;
Index: target-i386/op_helper.c
===================================================================
--- target-i386/op_helper.c (revision 4638)
+++ target-i386/op_helper.c (working copy)
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@
}
dpl = (e2 >> DESC_DPL_SHIFT) & 3;
cpl = env->hflags & HF_CPL_MASK;
- /* check privledge if software int */
+ /* check privilege if software int */
if (is_int && dpl < cpl)
raise_exception_err(EXCP0D_GPF, intno * 8 + 2);
/* check valid bit */
@@ -900,7 +900,7 @@
}
dpl = (e2 >> DESC_DPL_SHIFT) & 3;
cpl = env->hflags & HF_CPL_MASK;
- /* check privledge if software int */
+ /* check privilege if software int */
if (is_int && dpl < cpl)
raise_exception_err(EXCP0D_GPF, intno * 16 + 2);
/* check valid bit */
@@ -1166,7 +1166,7 @@
dpl = (e2 >> DESC_DPL_SHIFT) & 3;
cpl = env->hflags & HF_CPL_MASK;
- /* check privledge if software int */
+ /* check privilege if software int */
if (is_int && dpl < cpl)
raise_exception_err(EXCP0D_GPF, (intno << shift) + 2);
@@ -2698,7 +2698,7 @@
sp += addend;
if (rpl == cpl && (!(env->hflags & HF_CS64_MASK) ||
((env->hflags & HF_CS64_MASK) && !is_iret))) {
- /* return to same priledge level */
+ /* return to same privilege level */
cpu_x86_load_seg_cache(env, R_CS, new_cs,
get_seg_base(e1, e2),
get_seg_limit(e1, e2),
next reply other threads:[~2008-06-01 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-01 18:30 Stefan Weil [this message]
2008-06-03 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix several spelling bugs Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4842EAA9.1070706@mail.berlios.de \
--to=weil@mail.berlios.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.