From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4843D0FB.6070100@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:52:43 +0200 From: Till Kamppeter MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <482D53E9.4030201@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <482D53E9.4030201@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] Where should we track bugs in the LSB DDK? List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org, lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, webdevel@linux-foundation.org Hi, no one has any opinion about this? I need it done quickly, as printer manufacturers are asking me where to report bugs. Till Till Kamppeter wrote: > Hi, > > I got already the first bug report for the LSB DDK (Driver Development > Kit) by e-mail. > > As there are two suitable bug tracking systems > > - LSB: http://bugs.linuxbase.org/ > - OpenPrinting: http://bugs.linux-foundation.org/ (Prod.: OpenPrinting) > > I am in doubt where to report these bugs. WDYT? I would say it is better > located in the LSB bug tracker. > > This shows also that we should have only one bug tracker for the Linux > Foundation. So bugs can be more easily moved, for example an LSB-DDK bug > from OpenPrinting to LSB. > > Till >