From: Petr Stehlik <pstehlik@sophics.cz>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: "OGAWA Hirofumi" <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
� <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>,
"Linux Kernel Development" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msdos fs: remove unsettable atari option
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:54:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4843D179.7070809@sophics.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806020930170.7351@anakin>
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Geert Uytterhoeven has a patch in his POSTPONED queue that is supposed
>>> to fix Atari FAT. I can't speak to whether it works or why it's
>>> postponed, but it seems to compile.
>> I see. Although I don't know the patch, I'd like to add this part to
>> Geert's patch if possible. And when the patch can be posted, we can
>> re-add this part again.
>>
>> Geert, what do you think?
>
> It's in POSTPONED state because nobody speaks up for/against it.
> Personally, I don't know how much it is (still) needed...
> But a few years ago somebody contacted me that he used it succesfully
> on PA-RISC and i386 ;-)
>
> BTW, the patch is
> http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/~geert/linux-m68k-patches-2.6/POSTPONED/134-atari-fat.diff
>
> Atari people, I think now is the time to let it live or die...
The patch looks good, how can I let it live?
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-02 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-25 12:04 [PATCH] msdos fs: remove unsettable atari option René Scharfe
2008-05-25 15:42 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-06-01 22:10 ` Joseph Fannin
2008-06-01 22:43 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-06-02 7:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-06-02 10:54 ` Petr Stehlik [this message]
2008-06-02 15:03 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-07-26 15:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-07-26 19:53 ` Petr Stehlík
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4843D179.7070809@sophics.cz \
--to=pstehlik@sophics.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.