From: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@bull.net>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Test results for ext4
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:07:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4843F07C.5020306@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48402B49.7000805@redhat.com>
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Oh, also for completeness can you specify which xfsprogs you used?
> There were some recent changes made which affect the fs geometry, and
> might affect the results. So it would be good to fully specify.
OK, to do. To be honest, I didn't update them recently.
>
> Also why no fragmentation results for xfs or ext3?
I only forgot to do it.
But I didn't want to make a full comparaison of ext4 to xfs and ext3.
When testing the latest ext4 patch queue with a new kernel, I'd got
sometimes kernel crashes, or system hang, or bad performance.
Running the same tests on ext3 and xfs for which the code is more
stable I think gives me reference numbers for my tests.
In this way, I found in the past a problem in the IO scheduler.
Valérie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-02 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-30 15:50 Test results for ext4 Valerie Clement
2008-05-30 16:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-05-30 16:21 ` Valerie Clement
2008-05-30 16:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-05-30 16:28 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-02 13:07 ` Valerie Clement [this message]
2008-05-30 17:48 ` Mingming
2008-06-02 13:29 ` Valerie Clement
2008-05-30 18:12 ` Jose R. Santos
2008-06-02 13:44 ` Valerie Clement
2008-06-02 14:44 ` Jose R. Santos
2008-05-30 20:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-02 14:51 ` Valerie Clement
2008-05-31 19:35 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-02 13:20 ` Valerie Clement
2008-06-03 3:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-04 15:34 ` Valerie Clement
2008-06-04 15:41 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4843F07C.5020306@bull.net \
--to=valerie.clement@bull.net \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.