From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755032AbYFBP2k (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:28:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751297AbYFBP2d (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:28:33 -0400 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:34282 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751215AbYFBP2c (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:28:32 -0400 Message-ID: <484411A3.2000205@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:28:35 -0700 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: Further percpu/pda unification? References: <48440264.5060506@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <48440264.5060506@goop.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > I notice that there's now a unified asm-x86/percpu.h, and the pda is now > a per-cpu variable. But I also see that most of the stuff in percpu.h > is 32-bit only: all the accessor macros, x86_read/write_percpu, etc. Is > there some reason why that can't be made common, or is it just that > nobody has got around to it yet? > > Thanks, > J Hi Jeremy, I'll have a further unification patch shortly, just doing final testing now. Thanks, Mike